People v. Fox
| Decision Date | 22 November 1978 |
| Citation | 65 A.D.2d 880,410 N.Y.S.2d 180 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Russell A. FOX, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Thomas J. Neidl, Albany, for appellant.
Sol Greenberg, Albany County Dist. Atty., Albany (George H. Barber, Albany, of counsel), for respondent.
Before SWEENEY, J. P., and STALEY, MAIN, LARKIN and MIKOLL, JJ.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered July 13, 1977, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree and grand larceny in the third degree (2 counts).
The defendant was tried and convicted of the above charges which arose out of burglaries at 19 Tampa Avenue, Albany, on January 20, 1977, and at 13 Tampa Avenue on January 25, 1977. On this appeal, the defendant urges that it was reversible error for the trial court to deny the defendant's motion to suppress photographic identification testimony.
At the suppression hearing, the police officer testified that he took seven photographs to the Berns Camera Store, laid them down on a desk in no particular order and asked Mr. Berns if the subject who had been in the store to sell the stolen camera was among them. Mr. Berns picked up the photograph of the defendant Fox. The seven photographs were of seven black individuals with mustaches and similar hair styles. Each picture was a full view of the face and shoulders. There was no testimony that the viewer was told anything about the progress of the investigation or that anyone else had identified the defendant.
Although the other six photographs were polaroid type pictures and the photograph of the defendant was not and there were several other variations, we agree with the finding of the trial court that the photographs were substantially and sufficiently similar to each other so that they were not impermissibly suggestive. We find that the procedures used did not give rise to a substantial likelihood of irreparable identification (Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 88 S.Ct. 967, 19 L.Ed.2d 1247). In any event, by his own testimony at the trial, the defendant admitted the attempt to sell the camera in question to Mr. Berns, but contended that he had not stolen it but bought it from a person he called "Blue". Therefore, the issue of the identification procedure becomes moot.
The trial court made the sentences as to the crimes committed on January 20, 1977 concurrent with each other and made the sentences for the crimes committed on January 25, 1977 concurrent with each other, but then made the sentences for the crimes committed on January 25 consecutive to the crimes committed on January 20. The Trial Judge referred to the defendant...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Com. v. Clark
...1015, 98 S.Ct. 732, 54 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978); United States v. Cunningham, 423 F.2d 1269, 1271-1273 (4th Cir.1970); People v. Fox, 65 A.D.2d 880, 410 N.Y.S.2d 180, 881 (N.Y.1978); State v. Davis, 294 N.C. 397, 405- 406, 241 S.E.2d 656 (1978); Commonwealth v. Wilcox, 481 Pa. 284, 289-290, 392 A......
-
State v. Weddel
...39 N.Y.2d 197, 347 N.E.2d 621, 383 N.Y.S.2d 259 (1976) (only photograph with blank background among 11 shown); People v. Fox, 65 A.D.2d 880, 410 N.Y.S.2d 180 (1978) (only non-Polaroid-type photograph among 7 shown; also "several other variations"); State v. Davis, 294 N.C. 397, 241 S.E.2d 6......
-
People v. Ocasio
...and skin coloration (United States v. Kimbrough, 5 Cir., 481 F.2d 421; People v. Hinds, supra). The photographic array in People v. Fox, 65 A.D.2d 880, 410 N.Y.S.2d 180, was similar to that employed in this case. There the photographs were of seven black individuals with mustaches and simil......
-
People v. Tedesco
...full views of individuals who were substantially similar in appearance to the defendant (see, People v. Emmons, supra; People v. Fox, 65 A.D.2d 880, 410 N.Y.S.2d 180). The defendant also claims that the People failed to establish his guilt of the robbery of Carson, Soldo and Bretz beyond a ......