People v. Fox
Decision Date | 15 October 1872 |
Citation | 25 Mich. 492 |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Parties | The People v. Mathew M. Fox |
Heard October 9, 1872
Exceptions from Branch Circuit.
Exceptions sustained, and judgment arrested.
Dwight May, Attorney-general, for the People.
E. G Parsons and C. A.C Stacy, for the defendant.
In this case the defendant is informed against, for that, "on the 19th day of April, 1870, at the court house in the city of Coldwater, in said county, before the Honorable Charles Upson, then being circuit judge of the fifteenth judicial district of this State, a certain issue before then duly joined in the said court, between Romina Reed and Charles Reed, by Harriet M. Reed, their next friend, and Mathew M. Fox and Ephraim J. Paddock, in a certain plea of assumpsit, wherein the said Romina Reed and Charles Reed, by their next friend, were plaintiffs, and the said Mathew M. Fox and Ephraim J. Paddock were defendants, was then and there pending and untried, and then and there before the court as aforesaid, at the time aforesaid, the said defendants, Mathew M. Fox and Ephraim J. Paddock, by their attorney, Charles B. Pratt, moved the court to amend the plea before that time in said cause filed, and upon the hearing of said motion it became and was a material question, whether the said Ephraim J. Paddock signed or subscribed his name to a certain promissory note described in plaintiff's declaration in said cause filed-- said note bearing date June 30, 1866, made for three hundred dollars, payable to the heirs of the late Thomas Reed, Charles and Romina Reed, and purporting to be signed by M. M. Fox and E. J. Paddock--and that on the aforesaid nineteenth day of April, A. D. 1870, while said motion was pending as aforesaid, the said Mathew M. Fox came before Elon G. Parsons, a notary public in and for the city of Coldwater in said county of Branch, then and there having sufficient and competent authority to administer the oath to the said Mathew M. Fox in this behalf, and was then and there by the said Elon G. Parsons duly sworn, and falsely, wickedly, willfully, and maliciously took his corporal oath that the contents of a certain written affidavit by said Mathew M. Fox then and there subscribed, were true; said affidavit being in the words and figures following, that is to say:
"'Mathew M. Fox and Ephraim J. Paddock, ads."' Romina Reed and Charles Reed, by Harriet Reed, their next friend.
'"Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day of April, 1870.
"'(Signed) E. G. Parsons.'
"Whereas in truth and in fact, the said ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Lively
...as an element. This Court has previously indicated that, at common law, materiality was an element of perjury. See, e.g., People v. Fox, 25 Mich. 492, 496-497 (1872). Our Legislature, however, has constitutional authority to change the common law. Const. 1963, art. 3, § 7; Donajkowski v. Al......
-
People v. Knox, Docket Nos. 57927
...crime of perjury is not established unless falsehoods have been made under oath. M.C.L. Sec. 750.423; M.S.A. Sec. 28.665, People v. Fox, 25 Mich. 492, 496 (1872). It strikes us as fundamentally unfair to revoke the probation of a defendant on unsworn testimony where said defendant has deman......
-
People v. John
...It appeared in that case that no complaint had been made. The court, in discharging the defendant, quoted the following from People v. Fox, 25 Mich. 492: ‘There must be an oath authorized by law, an issue or cause to which facts were material, and a false statement regarding such facts upon......
- Flint v. People