People v. Francois
| Decision Date | 07 April 2016 |
| Docket Number | 107641. |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State Of New York, Respondent, v. Reginal FRANCOIS, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
138 A.D.3d 1165
30 N.Y.S.3d 349
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 02680
The PEOPLE of the State Of New York, Respondent,
v.
Reginal FRANCOIS, Appellant.
107641.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
April 7, 2016.
Anthony L. Riccio, New York City, for appellant.
P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Michael C. Wetmore of counsel), for respondent.
Before: PETERS, P.J., GARRY, ROSE and DEVINE, JJ.
GARRY, J.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Herrick, J.), rendered January 7, 2014, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of
criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (five counts).
In September 2012, two state troopers conducted a traffic stop of defendant's vehicle after observing that it had very dark tinted windows, such that the interior was not visible. Upon making contact with the driver, the troopers detected a
strong odor of marihuana emanating from the vehicle and inquired about its source. In response, a passenger in the vehicle admitted to having smoked marihuana earlier in the day. One of the troopers then ran a check of defendant's license, which revealed that his driving privileges had been suspended, and the trooper also tested and confirmed that the vehicle's windows exceeded the statutory tint limit (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 375 [12–a ] [b][1] ). The trooper then ordered defendant to exit the vehicle. As defendant was doing so, the trooper noticed a wallet on the driver side seat of the vehicle. The trooper searched this wallet, and discovered a Florida driver's license and four credit cards bearing a different name than defendant had provided. Based upon the trooper's experience, these appeared to be forged. Defendant was thereafter charged with five counts of possession of a forged instrument in the second degree. A Mapp /Dunaway hearing was held in which defendant argued that the troopers lacked legal justification to search the wallet and that the evidence obtained as a result of the search should be suppressed. Defendant further argued that, in light of the People's failure to preserve the wallet as evidence, an adverse inference against the People should be taken. County Court denied defendant's motion to suppress the wallet and reserved decision on defendant's request for an adverse inference. Defendant thereafter pleaded guilty to all five counts of the indictment, and was sentenced to five concurrent prison terms of 3 to 6 years. Defendant appeals.
We agree with County Court that the search of the wallet was legally justified. As this Court has repeatedly held, “ ‘[t]he odor of marihuana emanating from a vehicle, when detected by an officer qualified by training and experience to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Kalabakas
...109 N.Y.S.3d 726, 133 N.E.3d 429 [2019] ; People v. Dolan , 165 A.D.3d 1499, 1500–1501, 86 N.Y.S.3d 306 [2018] ; People v. Francois , 138 A.D.3d 1165, 1166, 30 N.Y.S.3d 349 [2016] ; People v. Souffrant , 93 A.D.3d 885, 887, 939 N.Y.S.2d 190 [2012], lv denied 19 N.Y.3d 968, 950 N.Y.S.2d 120,......
-
People v. Nelson, 106724
...72 L.Ed.2d 572 [1982] ; see People v. Ellis , 62 N.Y.2d 393, 398, 477 N.Y.S.2d 106, 465 N.E.2d 826 [1984] ; People v. Francois , 138 A.D.3d 1165, 1167, 30 N.Y.S.3d 349 [2016] ). For the first time on appeal, defendant now argues that the driver lacked actual or apparent authority to consent......
-
People v. Creary
... ... gain probable cause to search the entire vehicle including ... any closed or locked containers attached to the outside of a ... vehicle ( see United States v Ross , 456 U.S. 798 ... [1982]; People v Francois , 138 A.D.3d 1165 [3d Dept ... 2016]; People v Dixon , 107 A.D.3d 530 [1st Dept ... 2013]; People v Howard , 81 A.D.3d 404 [1st Dept ... 2011]; People v Jamison , 265 A.D.2d 198 [1st Dept ... 1999]; People v Britz , 239 A.D.2d 428 [2d Dept ... 1997]; People v ... ...
-
People v. Williams
...quotation marks and citation omitted], lv. denied 22 N.Y.3d 1087, 981 N.Y.S.2d 673, 4 N.E.3d 975 [2014] ; see People v. Francois, 138 A.D.3d 1165, 1166, 30 N.Y.S.3d 349 [2016] ; People v. Rasul, 121 A.D.3d at 1415–1416, 995 N.Y.S.2d 380 ; People v. Gaines, 57 A.D.3d 1120, 1121, 869 N.Y.S.2d......