People v. Frazier, 3220.

Decision Date25 March 2004
Docket Number3220.
Citation5 A.D.3d 288,773 N.Y.S.2d 543,2004 NY Slip Op 02265
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLOS FRAZIER, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

The court properly denied defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The record fails to support defendant's claim that the voluntariness of his plea was impaired by the medication that he was taking (see People v Alexander, 97 NY2d 482 [2002]; People v Rodriguez, 302 AD2d 317 [2003], lv denied 99 NY2d 657 [2003]). During the plea allocution he expressly denied that such medication had any effect upon his capacity to understand what was happening. Furthermore, an examination of the minutes of the plea and subsequent court appearances supports the court's conclusion that defendant was lucid and competent at the time of his plea.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur — Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Saxe and Marlow, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT