People v. Gathers

Decision Date25 August 2009
Docket Number2007-02409.
Citation65 A.D.3d 704,883 N.Y.S.2d 913,2009 NY Slip Op 06346
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTWAN GATHERS, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was not denied his due process right to a speedy trial (see People v Vernace, 96 NY2d 886, 888 [2001]; People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442 [1975]; People v Cesar, 6 AD3d 547 [2004]). The People established that the ongoing investigation provided a reasonable excuse for the 2½-year delay between the commission of the crimes and the indictment of the defendant (see People v Vernace, 96 NY2d at 888; People v Cesar, 6 AD3d at 547; People v Jones, 267 AD2d 250 [1999]; People v Brown, 209 AD2d 233 [1994]). Further, the Supreme Court properly determined the defendant's speedy trial motion without conducting a Singer hearing (see People v Singer, 44 NY2d 241 [1978]) since there was a fully-developed record as to the reasons for the delay (see People v Smith, 60 AD3d 706 [2009]; People v Cesar, 6 AD3d at 547).

SKELOS, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, BALKIN and BELEN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • People v. Rogers
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 1, 2013
    ...because the record provided County Court with a sufficient basis to determine whether the delay was justified ( see People v. Gathers, 65 A.D.3d 704, 704, 883 N.Y.S.2d 913,lv. denied13 N.Y.3d 859, 891 N.Y.S.2d 694, 920 N.E.2d 99;cf. People v. Watts, 78 A.D.2d 1008, 1009, 433 N.Y.S.2d 669). ......
  • People v. Fields
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 1, 2015
  • People v. Gardner
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 27, 2022
    ...the indictment on due process grounds because the record was fully developed as to the reasons for the delay (see People v. Gathers, 65 A.D.3d 704, 883 N.Y.S.2d 913 ; People v. Smith, 60 A.D.3d 706, 707, 874 N.Y.S.2d 541 ). The defendant identifies December 2013, when the NYPD received a "h......
  • People v. Gardner
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • April 27, 2022
    ... ...          Contrary ... to the defendant's contention, no further hearing was ... necessary on his motion to dismiss the indictment on due ... process grounds because the record was fully developed as to ... the reasons for the delay (see People v Gathers, 65 ... A.D.3d 704; People v Smith, 60 A.D.3d 706, 707) ...          The ... defendant identifies December 2013, when the NYPD received a ... "hit" matching his DNA profile to the DNA profile ... generated from the semen sample in this case, as the time ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT