People v. Gilliard
| Decision Date | 07 July 1988 |
| Citation | 528 N.E.2d 510,532 N.Y.S.2d 358,72 N.Y.2d 877 |
| Parties | , 528 N.E.2d 510 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Christopher GILLIARD, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division, 134 A.D.2d 178, 520 N.Y.S.2d 767, should be affirmed.
At defendant's trial on the charge of robbery in the first degree, evidence was adduced that complainant was riding alone in the last car of a subway train when defendant approached her, motioned with his hand in his pocket as though he had a gun, and demanded money. Believing defendant to have a gun, complainant surrendered 7 or 8 dollar bills. During the robbery, defendant never removed his hand from his pocket and the complainant never actually saw a gun. At the next subway stop, defendant left the train and walked down a flight of stairs to an underpass. As soon as defendant disappeared from her sight, complainant shouted to the police in the subway station that she had been robbed. Based on the description given, the police apprehended defendant one-quarter block from the subway station, a mere 2 to 3 minutes later. A search of defendant revealed eight one dollar bills, but no weapon.
The trial court refused defendant's request to charge the jury on the affirmative defense of robbery in the first degree--that the object displayed was not a loaded weapon capable of producing death or other serious physical injury (Penal Law § 160.15[4] ). Concluding that this was error, the Appellate Division reduced defendant's conviction to robbery in the second degree. *
A defendant is entitled to a charge on the affirmative defense to robbery in the first degree when there is presented sufficient evidence for the jury to find by a preponderance of the evidence that the elements of the defense are satisfied, i.e., that the object displayed was not a loaded weapon capable of producing death or other serious physical injury (see, Penal Law § 160.15[4]; People v. Moye, 66 N.Y.2d 887, 889, 498 N.Y.S.2d 767, 489 N.E.2d 736; People v. Baskerville, 60 N.Y.2d 374, 380, 469 N.Y.S.2d 646, 457 N.E.2d 752). Here, the evidence, viewed as it must be in the light most favorable to defendant ( People v. Farnsworth, 65 N.Y.2d 734, 492 N.Y.S.2d 12, 481 N.E.2d 552), was sufficient to present a factual question for the jury whether the object displayed was a firearm capable of causing death or other serious physical injury. Although defendant was out of the sight of complainant and the police for 2 or 3 minutes after the incident, the police officer--who took the same path through...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Taylor v. Kuhlmann
...serious physical injury." People v. Deboue, 234 A.D.2d 558, 652 N.Y.S.2d 296, 297 (2d Dep't 1996), citing, People v. Gilliard, 72 N.Y.2d 877, 532 N.Y.S.2d 358, 528 N.E.2d 510 (1988). It is incumbent, however, upon the defendant to prove that the subject weapon was unloaded or inoperable, Pe......
-
People v. Lopez
...a hand consciously concealed in clothing may suffice (People v. Knowles, 79 A.D.2d 116, 436 N.Y.S.2d 25; cf., People v. Gilliard, 72 N.Y.2d 877, 532 N.Y.S.2d 358, 528 N.E.2d 510), if under all the circumstances the defendant's conduct could reasonably lead the victim to believe that a gun i......
-
People v. Miaram
...the object displayed was not a loaded weapon capable of producing death or other serious physical injury” ( People v. Gilliard, 72 N.Y.2d 877, 878, 532 N.Y.S.2d 358, 528 N.E.2d 510). Here, no such evidence was presented to the jury ( see People v. Wells, 63 A.D.3d 967, 968, 882 N.Y.S.2d 150......
-
Johnson v. Colvin
...evidence "that the object displayed was not a loaded weapon capable of producing death or other serious physical injury." People v. Gilliard, 72 N.Y.2d 877, 878 (1988); see N.Y. Penal Law § 25.00(2). The court must view the evidence in a light most favorable to the defendant when evaluating......