People v. Gonzales
Decision Date | 25 February 1985 |
Citation | 211 Cal.Rptr. 74,164 Cal.App.3d 1194 |
Court | California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Parties | PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Raul E. GONZALES, Defendant and Appellant. AO25767. |
John K. Van de Kamp, Atty. Gen., Linda Ludlow, Cynthia Choy Ong, Deputy Attys. Gen., San Francisco, for plaintiff and respondent.
Paula W. Schlichter, Burlingame, for defendant and appellant.
Following an unsuccessful Penal Code section 1538.5 motion to suppress evidence essential to his conviction, defendant Gonzales pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of receiving stolen property. Proved, or admitted, were two prior convictions of felony. On his appeal from the judgment entered upon his plea, he urges error only in the denial of his motion to suppress evidence.
On his motion in the superior court, he contended that he had been unconstitutionally detained, and thus "seized," by a police officer, which official misconduct led to discovery that the automobile occupied by him was stolen. He repeats the contention here on his appeal.
Our function on such an appeal is established by the authority of People v. Lawler, 9 Cal.3d 156, 160, 107 Cal.Rptr. 13, 507 P.2d 621, as follows:
(Latter emphasis added.)
We relate the mainly uncontroverted evidence as it was presumably found true by the superior court.
Around 12:30 a.m. one morning a uniformed police officer observed a parked Chevrolet automobile with two occupants, in a neighborhood composed mainly of apartment buildings and townhouses. "Due to the numerous alcohol and drug and auto burglary problems ... and the late hour it was," the officer walked up to the vehicle. As the officer approached, the person in the vehicle's driver's seat rolled down the nearby window.
" " ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Linn
...cited United States v. Mendenhall (1980) 446 U.S. 544, 100 S.Ct. 1870, 64 L.Ed.2d 497 ( Mendenhall ) and People v. Gonzales (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 1194, 211 Cal.Rptr. 74 ( Gonzales ) as holding that police may "ask for identification and hold onto it." She argued that the absence of such fac......
-
People v. Douglas
...of force or show of authority. (See People v. Bowers (2004) 117 Cal.App.4th 1261, 1272, 13 Cal.Rptr.3d 15 ; People v. Gonzales (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 1194, 1196-1197, 211 Cal.Rptr. 74 ; People v. Sandoval (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 958, 962, 211 Cal.Rptr. 1.) The trial court's finding that Dougla......
-
People v. Sanchez
...325]; People v. Washington (1987) 192 Cal.App.3d 1120, 1124 ; People v. Profit (1986) 183 Cal.App.3d 849, 876-877 ; People v. Gonzales (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 1194, 1196-1197 .) We discern no difference in the governing legal principles applicable here. Rios could have approached Sanchez firs......
-
People v. Clark
...individual on the street ... [and] putting questions to him if the person is willing to listen...." (See also People v. Gonzales (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 1194, 1196, 211 Cal.Rptr. 74; Wilson v. Superior Court (1983) 34 Cal.3d 777, 789, 195 Cal.Rptr. 671, 670 P.2d 325.) Requesting appellant to ......
-
Search and seizure
...where a defendant voluntarily gives the officer an identification card and the officer is still holding it); People v. Gonzales (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 1194 (police may ask for identification and hold onto it without detaining individual); People v. Terrell (1999) 69 Cal.App.4th 1246 (volunta......