People v. Gravlin, Docket No. 17257

Decision Date29 March 1974
Docket NumberDocket No. 17257,No. 2,2
Citation217 N.W.2d 404,52 Mich.App. 467
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William G. GRAVLIN, Defendant-Appellant
CourtCourt of Appeal of Michigan — District of US

Joseph L. Hardig, Jr., Birmingham, for defendant-appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Sol. Gen., L. Brooks Patterson, Pros. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before HOLBROOK, P.J., and ALLEN and VanVALKENBURG*, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, William G. Gravlin, was arrested on September 29, 1964, and charged with murder in the first degree. M.C.L.A. § 750.316; M.S.A. § 28.548. On January 14, 1965, defendant was adjudicated incompetent to stand trial and committed to Ionia State Hospital. Three years later defendant was adjudicated competent to stand trial. He was tried and convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison, without receiving any credit for the time he spent in custody.

On appeal defendant contends that he should have been given credit against his sentence for the time spent in jail and in custody at Ionia State Hospital prior to his sentence. We agree.

The statute in effect at the time of defendant's commitment to Ionia (M.C.L.A. § 767.27; M.S.A. § 28.967) was amended effective March 10, 1967, by 1966 P.A. 266. A section of the amended statute, M.C.L.A. § 767.27a(9); M.S.A. § 28.966(11)(9) requires:

'Time spent in custody under subsections (3), (5), (6), (7) and (8) shall be credited against any sentence imposed on the defendant in the pending criminal case or in any other case arising from the same transaction. The statute of limitations on the pending criminal charge or any other charge arising from the same transaction shall commence to run on the entry of an order of commitment under subsection (5) of this section and shall continue to run until and unless the committing court determines under subsection (8) that the defendant is competent to stand trial.'

Section 3 of the act states that persons presently committed to Ionia State Hospital are subject to the provisions of this 1966 amendatory act. Therefore, the time defendant spent in custody at Ionia must be credited against his sentence.

The same result is required under M.C.L.A. § 769.11b; M.S.A. § 28.1083(2) which states:

'Whenever any person is hereafter convicted of any crime within this state and has served any time in jail prior to sentencing because of being denied or unable to furnish bond for the offense of which he is convicted, the trial court in imposing sentence shall specifically grant credit against the sentence for such time served in jail prior to sentencing.'

This statutory provisions is remedial and should be liberally construed to effectuate the statutory purpose sought to be achieved by the Legislature in its enactment. People v. Cohen, 35 Mich.App. 706, 192 N.W.2d 652 (1971); People v. Potts, 46 Mich.App. 538, 208 N.W.2d 583 (1973).

A 'jail' means a place of confinement and a mental hospital...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • State v. Tal-Mason
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 20, 1986
    ...State v. Mackley, 220 Kan. 518, 552 P.2d 628 (1976); State v. La Badie, 87 N.M. 391, 534 P.2d 483 (N.M.App.1975); People v. Gravlin, 52 Mich. App. 467, 217 N.W.2d 404 (1974). At least one court has gone further, ruling that the statute must be interpreted broadly so as "to avoid an unconsti......
  • State v. Nagle
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • April 30, 1986
    ...Model Penal Code (1962), Section 301.1(3), denies credit for time spent in jail as a condition of probation.4 People v. Gravlin (1974), 52 Mich.App. 467, 217 N.W.2d 404, 405.5 State v. Hersman (1978), 161 W.Va. 371, 242 S.E.2d 559, 561.6 State v. Shaw (1979), 202 Neb. 766, 772, 277 N.W.2d 1......
  • State v. La Badie
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • April 2, 1975
    ...contrary. We disagree. The language in Roberts, supra, is not supported by either case or statutory authority. See People v. Gravlin, 52 Mich.App. 467, 217 N.W.2d 404 (1974). The State also relies on Lange v. Schauer, 520 P.2d 753 (Colo.1974). Lange is not in point because the state hospita......
  • People v. Chamberlain
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • November 9, 1984
    ...the time was not spent in the "county jail". Stange, supra (residential substance-abuse rehabilitation program); People v. Gravlin, 52 Mich.App. 467, 217 N.W.2d 404 (1974) (mental hospital); People v. Ervin Thomas, 58 Mich.App. 9, 226 N.W.2d 734 (1975) (juvenile detention facility). In othe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT