People v. Grayton, 2003-01951.
Decision Date | 11 October 2005 |
Docket Number | 2003-01951. |
Citation | 2005 NY Slip Op 07551,22 A.D.3d 598,801 N.Y.S.2d 757 |
Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NATHANIEL GRAYTON, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, his constitutional right to be present at a material stage of the trial was not violated (see People v Morales, 80 NY2d 450, 455-457 [1992]; People v Babb, 226 AD2d 469, 470 [1996]; People v Chicas, 204 AD2d 476, 476-477 [1994]).
The Supreme Court properly admitted into evidence photographs depicting the shirt worn by the murder victim (see People v Pobliner, 32 NY2d 356, 369-370 [1973], cert denied 416 US 905 [1974]; People v Collic, 285 AD2d 514, 515 [2001]; People v DeBerry, 234 AD2d 470, 470-471 [1996]).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not warrant reversal.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Grayton v. Ercole
...holding that “his constitutional right to be present at a material stage of the trial was not violated.” People v. Grayton, 22 A.D.3d 598, 801 N.Y.S.2d 757, 757 (2d Dep't 2005). A judge of the New York Court of Appeals denied Grayton permission to appeal the Appellate Division's order. Peop......
- People v. Windley
- People v. Gonzalez, 2002-11320.
- People v. Grayton