People v. Green

Decision Date27 September 2004
Docket Number2002-06552.
Citation781 N.Y.S.2d 917,2004 NY Slip Op 06779,10 A.D.3d 731
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. MAURICE GREEN, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrero, J.), entered June 21, 2002, which, after a hearing, granted those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to controvert a search warrant and to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, and those branches of the motion which were to controvert the search warrant and to suppress physical evidence are denied.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the challenged search warrant application, interpreted in a commonsense manner (see People v Hanlon, 36 NY2d 549, 558-559 [1975]; People v Harvey, 298 AD2d 527, 528 [2002]), provided sufficient information to support a reasonable belief that evidence of a crime would be found in the subject apartment (see People v Hanlon, supra; People v Harvey, supra at 529; cf. People v Bigelow, 66 NY2d 417, 423-424 [1985]; People v McRay, 51 NY2d 594, 602 [1980]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in granting those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to controvert the search warrant and to suppress physical evidence seized from the apartment (see People v Harvey, supra; People v Paccione, 259 AD2d 563 [1999]).

In light of the defendant's concession on appeal that the Aguilar-Spinelli rule does not apply (see Aguilar v Texas, 378 US 108 [1964]; Spinelli v United States, 393 US 410 [1969]), we do not reach the issue of the confidential informant's reliability.

Ritter, J.P., H. Miller, S. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • People v. Lambey
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 30 Octubre 2019
    ...People v. Leggio, 84 A.D.3d 1116, 1117, 923 N.Y.S.2d 188 ; People v. Griffin, 28 A.D.3d 578, 578–579, 816 N.Y.S.2d 86 ; People v. Green, 10 A.D.3d 731, 731–732, 781 N.Y.S.2d 917 ). That standard is not met where the conduct or activity said to supply probable cause was "as consistent with i......
  • People v. Higgins
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 31 Mayo 2023
    ...sufficient information to support a reasonable belief that evidence of a crime would be found (citations omitted)." People v. Green, 10 A.D.3d 731, 731-32 (2nd Dept. 2004), appeal denied, 4 N.Y.3d 744 (2004). Overly Broad and Insufficiently Particular The test for determining the sufficienc......
  • People v. Garcia, 1998-10549.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 27 Septiembre 2004

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT