People v. Green

Decision Date31 August 2006
Docket Number8750.
Citation820 N.Y.S.2d 271,2006 NY Slip Op 06353,32 A.D.3d 364
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TIMOTHY GREEN, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). The evidence, including testimony that in the midst of a verbal dispute with the victim over a debt owed by defendant, defendant proceeded to stab the victim multiple times, disproved defendant's justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt.

The court properly refused to include in its justification charge an instruction on the use of deadly physical force to prevent the commission of a robbery (Penal Law § 35.15 [2] [b]). There was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to defendant, that at the time of the assault the victim was using or threatening the immediate use of force to obtain money (see Penal Law § 160.00).

Defendant did not preserve his claim that the court's justification charge was also deficient because it did not include an instruction that an acquittal based on justification would remove from the jury's consideration any lesser charges based on the same conduct, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the justification charge, viewed as a whole (see People v Coleman, 70 NY2d 817 [1987]), properly conveyed that principle.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Sullivan and McGuire, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Ginx Inc. v. Alliance
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • August 19, 2010
    ... ... financially viable, the Evanses (together with Soho Alliance and Sweeney) interfered with Plaintiffs' ability to make contracts with the people who would have walked in the door to eat, drink and socialize-a form of interference with prospective business relations. There are multiple ... Id. at 414-15 ( citing Phelps ). And in Green v. State Bar of Texas, 27 F.3d 1083 (5th Cir.1994), an African-American insurance adjuster, who had been enjoined from practicing law without a ... ...
  • People v. Daggett
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 5, 2017
    ...v. Palmer, 34 A.D.3d 701, 703–704, 826 N.Y.S.2d 77, lv. denied 8 N.Y.3d 848, 830 N.Y.S.2d 707, 862 N.E.2d 799 ; People v. Green, 32 A.D.3d 364, 365, 820 N.Y.S.2d 271, lv. denied 7 N.Y.3d 902, 826 N.Y.S.2d 611, 860 N.E.2d 73 ). We note, however, that there was "overwhelming evidence disprovi......
  • People v. Gorton
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 11, 2021
    ...N.Y.S.3d 190 [4th Dept. 2019], lv denied 34 N.Y.3d 1080, 116 N.Y.S.3d 155, 139 N.E.3d 813 [2019] ; see also People v. Green , 32 A.D.3d 364, 365, 820 N.Y.S.2d 271 [1st Dept. 2006], lv denied 7 N.Y.3d 902, 826 N.Y.S.2d 611, 860 N.E.2d 73 [2006] ). Although the victim testified that he told d......
  • 904 Tower Apartment LLC v. Cuomo, Index No. 105022/2010
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • May 23, 2014
    ... ... See 2 Fifth Ave. Tenants Assn. v. Abrams , 183 A.D.2d 577, 578 (1st Dep't 1992); Green Harbour Homeowners' Assn., Inc. v. G.H. Dev. & Constr., Inc. , 14 A.D.3d 963, 967 (3d Dep't 2005). While the sponsor's inability to perform its ... Gen. Bus. Law 352-e(l)(b); 13 N.Y.C.R.R. 21.1(b); People v. Lurie , 249 A.D.2d 119, 121 (1st Dep't 1998). Given that purpose and the information in the offering plan and its amendments, respondent ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT