People v. Green
| Decision Date | 03 October 2002 |
| Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>WILLIAM GREEN, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
298 A.D.2d 143
747 N.Y.S.2d 767
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,
v.
WILLIAM GREEN, Appellant.
Decided October 3, 2002.
Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Rosenberger, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant, who was hospitalized for physical reasons only, was convicted of sexually abusing two of his fellow hospital patients in violation of Penal Law § 130.65 (2), which applies when the victim "is incapable of consent by reason of being physically helpless." "`Physically helpless' means that a person is unconscious or for any other reason is physically unable to communicate unwillingness to an act" (Penal Law § 130.00 [7]). The People established that both victims were so severely handicapped that they were not capable of communicating an unwillingness to act. While there was evidence that each victim could make reflexive body motions, the evidence did not warrant a conclusion that either victim was capable of making voluntary movements designed to communicate unwillingness (compare, People v Huurre, 193 AD2d 305, affd 84 NY2d 930).
We perceive no basis for a reduction of sentence.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Fourtin
...to an act’ ”), appeal denied, 12 N.Y.3d 925, 912 N.E.2d 1087, 884 N.Y.S.2d 706 (2009); and People v. Green, 298 App.Div.2d 143, 144, 747 N.Y.S.2d 767 (Both victims were the defendant's fellow hospital patients and “were so severely handicapped that they were not capable of communicating an ......
-
State v. Fourtin
...to an act'"), appeal denied, 12 N.Y.3d 925, 912 N.E.2d 1087, 884 N.Y.S.2d 706 (2009); and People v. Green, 298 App. Div. 2d 143, 144, 747 N.Y.S.2d 767 (Both victims were the defendant's fellow hospital patients and "were so severely handicapped that they were not capable of communicating an......
-
People v. Jones
...v. Battease, 74 A.D.3d 1571, 1573–1574, 904 N.Y.S.2d 241;People v. Chapman, 54 A.D.3d 507, 509–510, 862 N.Y.S.2d 660;People v. Green, 298 A.D.2d 143, 747 N.Y.S.2d 767;People v. Conto, 218 A.D.2d 665, 666, 630 N.Y.S.2d 542;People v. Huurre, 193 A.D.2d 305, 306–307, 603 N.Y.S.2d 179,affd.84 N......
- MATTER OF SANDRA C.