People v. Green

Decision Date15 February 1977
Citation56 A.D.2d 610,391 N.Y.S.2d 655
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Lenwood GREEN, a/k/a Al Brown, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

William J. Gallagher and William E. Hellerstein, New York City (Andrew E. Abraham, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

John J. Santucci, Dist. Atty., Kew Gardens (Joan L. Craig, Brooklyn, of counsel), for respondent.

Before HOPKINS, Acting P.J., and MARTUSCELLO, COHALAN and DAMIANI, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 17, 1972, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and grand larceny in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing the conviction of robbery in the first degree to a conviction of robbery in the third degree, and vacating the sentence imposed upon that conviction. As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to Criminal Term for resentence on the conviction of robbery in the third degree.

Defendant was charged with robbery in the first degree, to wit, forcibly stealing property while using or threatening 'the immediate use of a dangerous instrument' (see Penal Law, § 160.15, subd. 3). A dangerous instrument is defined as 'any instrument * * * which * * * is readily capable of causing death or other serious physical injury' (Penal Law, § 10.00, subd. 13). The evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to establish that the object partially displayed by defendant during the robbery was an instrument 'readily capable of causing death or other serious physical injury.' Consequently, the charge of robbery in the first degree was not sufficiently proved.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • People v. Johnson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 7, 1978
    ...upon use or threatened use of a dangerous instrument cannot stand (cf. People v. Early, 59 A.D.2d 912, 399 N.Y.S.2d 145; People v. Green, 56 A.D.2d 610, 391 N.Y.S.2d 655; People v. Briggs, 52 A.D.2d 1053). Accordingly, the new trial must be restricted to the counts supported by the evidence......
  • People v. Henry
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 15, 1977
  • People v. Brown
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • April 17, 1980
    ...was a "dangerous instrument" (People v. Cwikla, supra; People v. Castaldo, supra; People v. Briggs, supra; People v. Green, 56 A.D.2d 610, 391 N.Y.S.2d 655 (2d Dept., 1977); People v. Early, 59 A.D.2d 912, 399 N.Y.S.2d 145 (2d Dept., 1977); People v. Iglesias, supra Since it was not proven ......
  • People v. Lieboff
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 15, 1977
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT