People v. Gwyer
| Decision Date | 02 December 1958 |
| Citation | 179 N.Y.S.2d 987,7 A.D.2d 711 |
| Parties | , 37 Lab.Cas. P 65,615 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Arthur GWYER, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
W. B. Linker, New York City, for defendant-appellant.
P. Preiser, New York City, for respondent.
Before BOTEIN, P. J., and BREITEL, FRANK, VALENTE and STEVENS, JJ.
The judgment appealed from is reversed and the complaint dismissed. The defendnat is charged with offering for sale and causing to be sold services of his laundromat on Sunday, in violation of § 2147, of the Penal Law. This section is entitled 'Public Traffic on Sunday.' By its introductory language 'All manner of public selling or offering for sale of any property upon Sunday is prohibited.' Thereafter, certain exceptions are enumerated. In People v. Dunford, 1912, 207 N.Y. 17, 100 N.E. 433, decided when the statute was much as it is today, though not as extensive in the exceptions noted, the court observed 'The word 'traffic' has the popular meaning of an exchange, or a passing of goods, or commodities, for an equivalent in goods, or money.' 207 N.Y. at page 20, 100 N.E. at page 434. 'It seems to be intended by this legislation to declare that act a nuisance, which disturbs the public rest on Sunday, or tends to profane the day by any unnecessary, or noisy, conduct.' 207 N.Y. at page 21, 100 N.E. at page 434. Cf. People v. Friedman, 302 N.Y. 75, 96 N.E.2d 184. The prohibition of § 2147, Penal Law, referred to and was designed to include tangible personal property, not services. Nor does the fact that an automatic vending machine on the premises afforded prospective users of the laundromat an opportunity to obtain soap and bleach by the deposit of coins, independent of any participation by the defendant, bring it within the language of the section. Order filed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People on Complaint of Follar v. Finkelstein
...selling but only giving service) provided, however, the bench is favorably inclined toward Sunday activity of that kind (People v. Gwyer, 7 A.D.2d 711, 179 N.Y.S.2d 987). But should his luck be tainted by misfortune, and he comes before another bench, he will be convicted for doing the same......
-
People v. Abrahams
...the story well. Reading them, we learn that the operation of such a laundry is not a prohibited sale under section 9 (People v. Gwyer, 7 A.D.2d 711, 179 N.Y.S.2d 987), but Is the practice of a trade not 'necessary' on Sunday (People v. Kaplan, 8 A.D.2d 163, 188 N.Y.S.2d 673). Further, this ......
-
People on Information of Ferguson v. Andob Corp.
...In Volume XXXV, Notre Dame Lawyer, No. 3 (May, 1960) at page 429, a summary of the decisions appears as follows: 'In People v. Gwyer, 7 App.Div.2d 711 , a conviction for violating the Sunday law was reversed as to an owner of a laundromat because he was prosecuted under the section of the s......
-
People v. Kaplan
...comes within the proscription of Article 192 of the Penal Law, which contains the 'Sabbath' laws. We recently held in People v. Gwyer, 7 A.D.2d 711, 179 N.Y.S.2d 987, that such an operation did not violate Section 2147 of Article 192 which forbids (with certain specified exceptions) the pub......