People v. Hall, 264 KA 14-01407.
Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
Citation | 2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 03296,138 A.D.3d 1407,30 N.Y.S.3d 422 |
Docket Number | 264 KA 14-01407. |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Derrick L. HALL, Defendant–Appellant. |
Decision Date | 29 April 2016 |
138 A.D.3d 1407
30 N.Y.S.3d 422
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 03296
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Derrick L. HALL, Defendant–Appellant.
264 KA 14-01407.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
April 29, 2016.
David J. Farrugia, Public Defender, Lockport (Joseph G. Frazier of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant.
Michael J. Violante, District Attorney, Lockport (Thomas H. Brandt of Counsel), for Respondent.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, DeJOSEPH, and TROUTMAN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM:
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of two counts of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05[2] ). The plea was in satisfaction of an indictment charging assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. Defendant contends that County Court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his plea because it was coerced and was not knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered owing to the ineffective assistance of counsel. We note at the outset that, even assuming, arguendo, that the waiver of the right to appeal is valid, we nevertheless agree with defendant that his contention survives the plea and the waiver of the right to appeal to the extent that defendant contends that “the plea bargaining process was infected by [the] allegedly ineffective assistance or that [he] entered the plea because of [his] attorney['s] allegedly poor performance” (People v. Gleen, 73 A.D.3d 1443, 1444, 900 N.Y.S.2d 812, lv. denied 15 N.Y.3d 773, 907 N.Y.S.2d 462, 933 N.E.2d 1055 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v. Davis, 119 A.D.3d 1383, 1383, 989 N.Y.S.2d 224, lv. denied 24 N.Y.3d 960, 996 N.Y.S.2d 219, 20 N.E.3d 999 ; People v. Judd, 111 A.D.3d 1421, 1422–1423, 975 N.Y.S.2d 312,
lv. denied 23 N.Y.3d 1039, 993 N.Y.S.2d 253, 17 N.E.3d 508 ).
In a letter to the court, defendant alleged that defense counsel forced him to accept the plea offer by informing him, inter alia, that if convicted after trial, the court would sentence him to a term exceeding 20 years. Defense counsel thereafter filed a motion to withdraw the plea,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kerwin v. Fusco, 230 CA 15-01344.
...or her duties and thereby launches a force or instrument of harm, where the plaintiff detrimentally relies on the continued performance 30 N.Y.S.3d 422 of the contracting party's duties, and “where the contracting party has entirely displaced the other party's duty to maintain the premises ......
-
People v. Adamo, 109964
...by reason of mental disease or defect (see People v. Perry, 148 A.D.3d 1423, 1424–1425, 50 N.Y.S.3d 594 [2017] ; cf. People v. Hall, 138 A.D.3d 1407, 1407–1408, 30 N.Y.S.3d 422 [2016] ).In addition, the December 2014 letter, together with the occurrences and statements made during the Janua......
-
People v. Gumpton, 979 KA 19-00934
...a legitimate question as to the voluntariness of the plea" (People v Brown, 14 N.Y.3d 113, 116 [2010]; see People v Hall, 138 A.D.3d 1407, 1407-1408 [4th Dept 2016]). We therefore hold the case, reserve decision, and remit the matter to County Court to appoint new defense counsel and to rul......
-
People v. Gumpton, 2021-06519
...a legitimate question as to the voluntariness of the plea" (People v Brown, 14 N.Y.3d 113, 116 [2010]; see People v Hall, 138 A.D.3d 1407, 1407-1408 [4th Dept 2016]). We therefore hold the case, reserve decision, and remit the matter to County Court to appoint new defense counsel and to rul......