People v. Hall

Decision Date12 July 1993
Citation600 N.Y.S.2d 274,195 A.D.2d 521
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Marzet HALL, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Warren S. Hecht, Forest Hills, for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, Dist. Atty., Kew Gardens (Robert Weisenfeld and Gary Fidel, of counsel), for respondent.

Before MANGANO, P.J., and ROSENBLATT, LAWRENCE, COPERTINO and JOY, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered October 22, 1990, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

At sentencing, the defendant presented a written pro se motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, alleging, inter alia, that his plea was the result of coercion and ineffective assistance of counsel. Contrary to the defendant's contention, we find that he had a reasonable opportunity to present his claims and the matter need not be remitted for a further inquiry (see, People v. Machado, 181 A.D.2d 796, 582 N.Y.S.2d 23). Moreover, the defendant's belated claims of coercion and ineffective assistance of counsel are flatly refuted by the record of the plea proceeding in which he knowingly and voluntarily made a complete and detailed plea allocution in the presence of competent counsel. The defendant expressed no dissatisfaction with his counsel at the time of the plea, after the court had fully apprised him of the consequences of pleading guilty (see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170; People v. Zaia, 181 A.D.2d 931, 582 N.Y.S.2d 212).

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • People v. Jackson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 2 Agosto 2011
    ...614; People v. Martinez, 78 A.D.3d 966, 967, 910 N.Y.S.2d 684; People v. Gedin, 46 A.D.3d 701, 847 N.Y.S.2d 231; People v. Hall, 195 A.D.2d 521, 600 N.Y.S.2d 274). The defendant's challenge to the procedure by which he was sentenced as a second felony offender ( see CPL 400.21) is unpreserv......
  • People v. Caruso
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 11 Octubre 2011
    ...him of the consequences of pleading guilty’ ” ( People v. Douglas, 83 A.D.3d at 1093, 921 N.Y.S.2d 324, quoting People v. Hall, 195 A.D.2d 521, 522, 600 N.Y.S.2d 274). The defendant received an advantageous plea, and there is nothing in the record which casts doubt on the apparent effective......
  • People v. Douglas
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 26 Abril 2011
    ...his counsel at the time of the plea, after the court had fully apprised him of the consequences of pleading guilty” ( People v. Hall, 195 A.D.2d 521, 522, 600 N.Y.S.2d 274; see People v. Raymond, 3 A.D.3d 587, 770 N.Y.S.2d 655). Moreover, the defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of c......
  • People v. Witcher
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 22 Diciembre 1995
    ... ... Defendant's belated claims of coercion and innocence are unsupported by the record, which shows that defendant knowingly and voluntarily made a complete and detailed statement concerning his commission of the crime (see, People v. Hall, 195 A.D.2d 521, 522, 600 N.Y.S.2d 274, lv. denied 82 N.Y.2d 754, 603 N.Y.S.2d 996, 624 N.E.2d 182; People v. Lynch, 156 A.D.2d 884, 884-885, 550 N.Y.S.2d 104, lv. denied 75 N.Y.2d 921, 555 N.Y.S.2d 40, 554 N.E.2d 77) ...         The record also fails to support the contention in ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT