People v. Hampton

Citation475 N.Y.S.2d 273,61 N.Y.2d 963,463 N.E.2d 614
Parties, 463 N.E.2d 614 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Jeffrey HAMPTON, Respondent.
Decision Date22 March 1984
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division, 92 A.D.2d 490, 459 N.Y.S.2d 272, should be affirmed.

The trial court charged the jury that if it found that either defendant did not act in concert with the other then it must acquit both defendants. When the jury found defendant Coley not guilty and the defendant Hampton guilty the verdict was clearly repugnant under the court's charge.

The determination as to the repugnancy of the verdict is made solely on the basis of the trial court's charge and not on the correctness of those instructions (People v. Tucker, 55 N.Y.2d 1, 447 N.Y.S.2d 132, 431 N.E.2d 617). Because an examination of the instructions given to the jury in this case shows that the verdict returned was inherently contradictory, the trial court properly dismissed the charge against the defendant (People v. Carbonell, 40 N.Y.2d 948, 390 N.Y.S.2d 409, 358 N.E.2d 1034).

COOKE, C.J., and JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

To continue reading

Request your trial
32 cases
  • People v. Gallagher
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 14 de abril de 1986
    ...instructions (People v. Tucker, supra, 55 N.Y.2d at pp. 4, 7, 447 N.Y.S.2d 132, 431 N.E.2d 617; see also, People v. Hampton, 61 N.Y.2d 963, 964, 475 N.Y.S.2d 273, 463 N.E.2d 614). Applying these established principles to the present case it is apparent that the verdict does not fall within ......
  • People v. Muhammad
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 20 de outubro de 2011
    ...431 N.E.2d 617; see also People v. Green, 71 N.Y.2d 1006, 1008, 530 N.Y.S.2d 97, 525 N.E.2d 742 [1988]; People v. Hampton, 61 N.Y.2d 963, 964, 475 N.Y.S.2d 273, 463 N.E.2d 614 [1984] ). The underlying purpose of this rule is to ensure that an individual is not convicted of “a crime on which......
  • People v. Olcan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 12 de setembro de 1988
    ...is made solely on the basis of the trial court's charge and not on the correctness of those instructions" ( People v. Hampton, 61 N.Y.2d 963, 964, 475 N.Y.S.2d 273, 463 N.E.2d 614). Neither the legal accuracy of the charge nor the particular facts of the case are controlling with respect to......
  • People v. Delee
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 19 de julho de 2013
    ...not guilty of manslaughter in the first degree. We therefore modify the judgment accordingly ( see generally People v. Hampton, 61 N.Y.2d 963, 964, 475 N.Y.S.2d 273, 463 N.E.2d 614). We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions in both his main and supplemental pro se briefs and concl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT