People v. Hattemer
Decision Date | 03 June 1957 |
Citation | 164 N.Y.S.2d 188,4 A.D.2d 674 |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Philipp A. HATTEMER, Defendant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Edwyn Silberling, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiff.
Samuel I. Sloane, Patchogue, for defendant. Before NOLAN, P. J., and WENZEL, MURPHY, UGHETTA and HALLINAN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Motion to dismiss an indictment upon inspection of the minutes of the Grand Jury of the Extraordinary Trial and Special Term of the Supreme Court of Suffolk County.
Motion granted, indictment dismissed, and bail exonerated.
The indictment charges defendant with violations of section 1841 of the Penal Law. The testimony before the Grand Jury was insufficient in that there was no proof to show that the defendant willfully neglected to perform a duty enjoined by law. To warrant intentional neglect it had to be shown that defendant had actual knowledge that the purchases of food had been made in violation of the requirements with respect to notice and bidding. American Surety Co. of New York v. Sullivan, 2 Cir., 7 F.2d 605, 606; People v. Foster, 204 App.Div. 295, 198 N.Y.S. 7; Gardner v. People, 62 N.Y. 299; People v. Marrin, 205 N.Y. 275, 279-280, 98 N.E. 474, 475, 43 L.R.A., N.S., 754; People v. Harrison, 238 N.Y. 348, 351-352, 144 N.E. 636, 637.
To continue reading
Request your trial- People v. Hattemer, 7256
- People v. Hattemer
-
People v. Hattemer
...Nos. 7256, 7258). Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 24, 1957. Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, 4 A.D.2d 674, 164 N.Y.S.2d 188. Defendant was charged by indictment with violation of Section 1841 of the Penal Law, Consol.Laws, c. 40, making it a misdemeanor f......