People v. Hawk

Decision Date22 October 1935
Citation268 N.Y. 678,198 N.E. 555
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Elmer HAWK, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Broome County Court, entered May 29, 1935 (156 Misc. 870, 283 N. Y. S. 531) which affirmed a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions in the town of Chenango rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of a violation of subdivision 3 of section 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law (Consol. Laws, c. 3-B). The information charged that on or about January 13, 1935, the defendant, being licensed to sell alcoholic beverages for consumption on premises at the Dixie Inn, sold and delivered and caused to be sold and delivered at said Dixie Inn a pint of liquor for consumption off the premises where sold.

W. J. Relihan, of Binghamton, for appellant.

Donald W. Kramer, Asst. Dist. Atty., of Binghamton, for the People.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed.

CRANE, C. J., and LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN, and FINCH, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • People v. Danchak
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 13, 1965
    ...rel. Price v. Sheffield Farms-Slawson Decker Co., 225 N.Y. 25, 121 N.E. 474; People v. Hawk, 156 Misc. 870, 283 N.Y.S. 531, affd. 268 N.Y. 678, 198 N.E. 555.) In Commonwealth v. Koczwara, 397 Pa. 575, 155 A.2d 825, cited and approved in Leonard (supra), a conviction of a licensee under a st......
  • Segan Entertainment Inc. v. State Liquor Authority
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 15, 1977
    ...Grouping Corp. v. Epstein, 10 N.Y.2d 956, 224 N.Y.S.2d 277, 180 N.E.2d 58; cf. People v. Hawk, 156 Misc. 870, 283 N.Y.S. 531, affd. 268 N.Y. 678, 198 N.E. 555; contra: Matter of Patterson v. Rohan, 5 A.D.2d 870, 171 N.Y.S.2d I further would hold that the penalties imposed were not excessive. ...
  • Konopka v. Bruckman
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • May 27, 1943
    ...273 N.Y. 31, 6 N.E.2d 86;Lyman v. Kurtz, 166 N.Y. 274, 279,59 N.E. 903;People v. Hawk, 156 Misc. 870, 283 N.Y.S 531, affirmed 268 N.Y. 678, 198 N.E. 555;Clement v. Federal Union Surety Co., 122 App.Div. 18, 106 N.Y.S. 1061;Matter of Clement (Ruehl certificates) 144 App.Div. 156, 157, 128 N.......
  • People v. Leonard
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • May 26, 1960
    ...ingredient of this crime, he is responsible for the act of his employees (People v. Hawk, 156 Misc. 870, 283 N.Y.S. 531, affirmed 268 N.Y. 678, 198 N.E. 555; Commonwealth v. Koczwara, 397 Pa. 575, 155 A.2d 825; Hershorn v. People. 108 Colo. 43, 113 P.2d 680, 139 A.L.R. 297; State v. Schull,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT