People v. Hayes

Decision Date29 May 1984
Citation101 A.D.2d 893,475 N.Y.S.2d 805
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Lawrence G. HAYES, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Burton C. Agata, Hempstead, for appellant. John J. Santucci, Dist. Atty., Kew Gardens (Ray Cetteta, of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Bosch, J.), imposed November 26, 1974, upon remand from the Court of Appeals. Resentence reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for resentencing in accordance herewith. With commendable candor the People agree with the defendant's contention that because two and one-half years elapsed between the defendant's original sentence and his resentence, the sentencing court should have secured an up-dated presentence report before resentencing the defendant and that based upon our holding in People v. Cruz, 89 A.D.2d 569, 451 N.Y.S.2d 1001, a reversal and remittance for resentencing is necessary.

MOLLEN, P.J., and LAZER, MANGANO and NIEHOFF, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • People v. Jackson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 24, 1984
    ...violated the terms of probation must obtain and consider an updated presentence report (see CPL 390.20, subd. 1; People v. Hayes, 101 A.D.2d 893, 475 N.Y.S.2d 805; People v. Cruz, 89 A.D.2d 569, 451 N.Y.S.2d 1001; People v. Klein, 78 A.D.2d 743, 432 N.Y.S.2d 735; People v. Halaby, 77 A.D.2d......
  • People v. Simpson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 27, 1992
    ...433; People v. Randolphe, 114 A.D.2d 426, 494 N.Y.S.2d 142; People v. Jackson, 106 A.D.2d 93, 483 N.Y.S.2d 725; People v. Hayes, 101 A.D.2d 893, 475 N.Y.S.2d 805). In People v. Roman, supra, and People v. Rice, supra, this rule was applied even where, as here, the adjudication of the defend......
  • People v. Lucas
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 14, 1986
    ...The court should have obtained an up-to-date presentence report before imposing the resentence (see, CPL 390.20; People v. Hayes, 101 A.D.2d 893, 475 N.Y.S.2d 805; People v. Cruz, 89 A.D.2d 569, 451 N.Y.S.2d ...
  • People v. Sykes
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 15, 1989
    ...(see, People v. Laster, 140 A.D.2d 233, 528 N.Y.S.2d 831; People v. Martinez, 118 A.D.2d 661, 499 N.Y.S.2d 964; People v. Hayes, 101 A.D.2d 893, 475 N.Y.S.2d 805; People v. Cruz, 89 A.D.2d 569, 451 N.Y.S.2d ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT