People v. Hemion

Citation828 N.Y.S.2d 815,37 A.D.3d 616,2007 NY Slip Op 01317
Decision Date13 February 2007
Docket Number2006-03752.
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DENNIS HEMION, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea on this ground (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637 [1983]; People v Velazquez, 21 AD3d 388 [2005]).

The defendant's valid and unrestricted written waiver of the right to appeal, as part of his plea agreement, precludes appellate review of his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Ramos, 21 AD3d 1125 [2005], affd 7 NY3d 737 [2006]; cf. People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9 [1989]).

Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Fisher, Lifson and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • People v. Sulaiman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 9, 2015
    ...855 ; People v. Carr, 89 A.D.3d 1033, 1034, 933 N.Y.S.2d 372 ; People v. Trent, 74 A.D.3d 1370, 903 N.Y.S.2d 236 ; People v. Hemion, 37 A.D.3d 616, 616–617, 828 N.Y.S.2d 815 ). Contrary to the defendant's contention, the narrow exception to the preservation rule does not apply here (see Peo......
  • People v. Guzman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 13, 2007
  • People v. Hicks, 2005-06560.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 13, 2007

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT