People v. Hemion
Citation | 828 N.Y.S.2d 815,37 A.D.3d 616,2007 NY Slip Op 01317 |
Decision Date | 13 February 2007 |
Docket Number | 2006-03752. |
Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DENNIS HEMION, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea on this ground (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637 [1983]; People v Velazquez, 21 AD3d 388 [2005]).
The defendant's valid and unrestricted written waiver of the right to appeal, as part of his plea agreement, precludes appellate review of his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Ramos, 21 AD3d 1125 [2005], affd 7 NY3d 737 [2006]; cf. People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9 [1989]).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Sulaiman
...855 ; People v. Carr, 89 A.D.3d 1033, 1034, 933 N.Y.S.2d 372 ; People v. Trent, 74 A.D.3d 1370, 903 N.Y.S.2d 236 ; People v. Hemion, 37 A.D.3d 616, 616–617, 828 N.Y.S.2d 815 ). Contrary to the defendant's contention, the narrow exception to the preservation rule does not apply here (see Peo......
- People v. Guzman
- People v. Hicks, 2005-06560.