People v. De Herrera
Decision Date | 17 December 1981 |
Docket Number | No. 80CA0619,80CA0619 |
Citation | 647 P.2d 241 |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond DE HERRERA, Defendant-Appellant. . I |
Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary J. Mullarkey, Laura E. Udis, Asst. Attys. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.
J. Gregory Walta, State Public Defender, Suzanne Saunders, Elizabeth Joyce, Deputy State Public Defenders, Denver, for defendant-appellant.
Defendant appeals his conviction of aggravated robbery. We reverse.
Defendant was apprehended a short distance from a convenience food store shortly after the attendant claimed he had been robbed. At the time of his apprehension, defendant elected to remain silent. A search of defendant's person revealed a current driver's license and an expired driver's license under two different names as well as a pay stub payable to Raymond De Herrera. His companion advised police of the correct name of defendant.
In the caption of the robbery case, the prosecution named defendant with three aliases. Defendant's counsel, in an in limine hearing, requested that the aliases be deleted from the caption, which the court refused to do. Subsequently, the driver's licenses were admitted into evidence, and the court instructed the jury as follows:
Defendant contends the failure to strike his aliases from the caption and the instruction to the jury on the use of aliases was error. We agree and reverse.
Here, there is no evidence in the record that defendant supplied the police officers with a ficticious name in order to evade arrest. Since aliases tend to indicate to the public mind that the defendant is a member of the criminal classes and is therefore inherently suspect, the use of aliases by the People at trial is strongly disapproved. See United States v. Wilkerson, 456 F.2d 57 (6th Cir. 1972); State v. Smith, 55 Wash.2d 482, 348 P.2d 417 (1960). Therefore, before the People may introduce the defendant's use of aliases at...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. DeHerrera
...Denver, for respondent. DUBOFSKY, Justice. We granted certiorari to review the judgment of the Court of Appeals in People v. DeHerrera, 647 P.2d 241 (Colo.App.1981), which held that the district court erred by admitting evidence of the defendant's aliases, by failing to strike the aliases f......
-
People v. Talley
...Hence, defendant's use of the alias was clearly relevant to the crime charged, i.e., being an habitual criminal. People v. De Herrera, 647 P.2d 241 (Colo.App.1981), cert. granted June 21, 1982. Also, Talley insisted to the trial court that both names were his "real" We also reject Talley's ......
-
People v. Russo, 81CA0267
...use of aliases at trial, it must "offer evidence which shows the relevance of the alias to the crime charged." People v. De Herrera, 647 P.2d 241 (Colo.App.1981). Here, the prosecution showed that the defendant provided the alias rather than his real name at the time of the arrest, which ma......