People v. Heyward

Decision Date28 May 1993
Citation193 A.D.2d 1137,600 N.Y.S.2d 661
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harold HEYWARD, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Griffith Winthrop, Canandaigua, for appellant. R. Michael Tantillo by Brian Dennis, Canandaigua, for respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant's contention that the information supporting the search warrant was stale merely because it was acquired 12 and 13 days before the issuance of the warrant (see, People v. Bryan, 191 A.D.2d 1029, 595 N.Y.S.2d 150; People v. Clarke, 173 A.D.2d 550, 570 N.Y.S.2d 305). The search warrant application provided the issuing magistrate with information sufficient to support a reasonable belief that evidence of illegal drug activity would be present at the time and place of the search (see, People v. Bigelow, 66 N.Y.2d 417, 423, 497 N.Y.S.2d 630, 488 N.E.2d 451; People v. Bryan, supra; People v. St. Louis, 177 A.D.2d 882, 885, 576 N.Y.S.2d 466, lv. denied 79 N.Y.2d 953, 583 N.Y.S.2d 207, 592 N.E.2d 815).

Defendant's sentence is neither harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J.--Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.)

CALLAHAN, J.P., and GREEN, PINE, FALLON and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Town of East Hampton v. Omabuild USA No. 1, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 30 Mayo 1995
    ...for a search warrant is made " (People v. Clarke, 173 A.D.2d 550, 570 N.Y.S.2d 305 [emphasis supplied]; see, People v. Heyward, 193 A.D.2d 1137, 600 N.Y.S.2d 661; People v. Bryan, 191 A.D.2d 1029, 595 N.Y.S.2d 150). In the instant case, the affidavits of various Town officials alleged numer......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT