People v. Hiedeman

• Decision Date: 24 December 2020
• Docket Number: 110843
• Parties: The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Adam HIEDEMAN, Appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

189 A.D.3d 1902
136 N.Y.S.3d 577

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Adam HIEDEMAN, Appellant.

110843

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Calendar Date: November 18, 2020
Decided and Entered: December 24, 2020

136 N.Y.S.3d 578

Hug Law, PLLC, Albany (Matthew C. Hug of counsel), for appellant.

Jason M. Carusone, District Attorney, Lake George (Rebecca Nealon of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Lynch, J.P., Clark, Mulvey and Colangelo, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Clark, J.

189 A.D.3d 1902

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Warren County (Hall Jr., J.), rendered July 12, 2018, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of attempted rape in the second degree, attempted criminal sexual act in the second degree (two counts) and attempted endangering the welfare of a child.

In June 2017, the State Police, in conjunction with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Warren County Sheriff's Department, organized and ran an undercover operation designed to catch individuals seeking to engage in sexual activity with minors. As part of this operation, an investigator with the State Police posted an advertisement within the "casual encounters" section of Craigslist, stating that a 41–year–old man and his female "friend" were a "loving couple" looking for a male to join them for "some alternative/taboo fun." Defendant, who was in his thirties at the time, responded to the advertisement and thereafter engaged in a series of emails and text messages with undercover investigators involved in the operation, during which the investigators revealed that the "couple" referenced in the Craigslist post was a stepfather and his 14–year–old stepdaughter. The email and text conversations, as well as a phone call between defendant and one of the undercover investigators, ultimately led to defendant arriving at a "campsite" in Warren County, where he met and conversed with an investigator posing as the stepfather.

Defendant was subsequently arrested and charged with attempted

189 A.D.3d 1903

rape in the second degree, attempted criminal sexual act in the second degree (two counts) and attempted endangering the welfare of a child. Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted as charged. He was thereafter sentenced to three consecutive prison terms of four years each, followed by 10 years of postrelease supervision, on the attempted rape and attempted criminal sexual act convictions and to a concurrent term of one year on the conviction of attempted endangering the welfare of a child.¹ Defendant appeals, and we now reverse and dismiss the indictment.

136 N.Y.S.3d 579

Defendant asserts that his convictions are not supported by legally sufficient evidence and are against the weight of the evidence. Specifically, defendant argues that the evidence did not establish that he came "dangerously near" completing rape in the second degree, either charge of criminal sexual act in the second degree or endangering the welfare of a child, so as to constitute an "attempt" to commit any of those crimes under Penal Law § 110.00. He further argues that the People failed to prove that he harbored the requisite intent to commit the crimes charged. We agree with defendant on both points and, thus, find his convictions to be unsupported by legally sufficient evidence.

For a conviction on the charge of attempted rape in the second degree, the People had to prove that defendant, being at least 18 years old, attempted to engage in sexual intercourse with a minor less than 15 years old (see Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.30[1] ). To obtain convictions for attempted criminal sexual act in the second degree, as charged in the indictment, the People had to prove that defendant, being 18 years of age or older, attempted to perform oral sex on a minor less than 15 years old and attempted to receive oral sex from a minor less than 15 years old (see Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.45[1] ). Finally, for a conviction of attempted endangering the welfare of a child, the People had to prove that defendant attempted to knowingly act in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical, mental or moral welfare of a child less than 17 years old (see Penal Law §§ 110.00, 260.10[1] ).

Pursuant to Penal Law § 110.00, "[a] person is guilty of an

189 A.D.3d 1904

attempt to commit a crime when, with intent to commit a crime, he [or she] engages in conduct which tends to effect the commission of such crime." As the Court of Appeals has repeatedly stated, "the ‘law does not punish evil thoughts, nor does it generally consider mere preparation sufficiently dangerous to require legal intervention’ by imposing attempt liability" ( People v. Lendof–Gonzalez, 36 N.Y.3d 87, 88, 139 N.Y.S.3d 84, 163 N.E.3d 15,...