People v. Hobbs

Decision Date16 January 1992
Citation822 P.2d 1292,4 Cal.Rptr.2d 145
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
PartiesPEOPLE, Respondent, v. Janet Marie HOBBS, Appellant. S023739.

Prior report: Cal.App., 286 Cal.Rptr. 135.

Respondent's petition for review GRANTED.

KENNARD, ARABIAN, BAXTER and GEORGE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Corbett v. PharmaCare U.S., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • 19 octobre 2021
    ... ... 132, 144, 83 S.Ct. 1210, 10 L.Ed.2d 248 (1963) ) ("States have always possessed a legitimate interest in the protection of (their) people against fraud and deception in the sale of food products at retail markets within their borders."). Under implied preemption, there are two types: ... ...
  • Sharon P. v. Arman, Ltd.
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • 16 décembre 1999
    ... ... Since sexual assault is not a reasonably foreseeable risk associated with bank robberies (see People v. Nguyen (1993) 21 Cal.App.4th 518, 533, 26 Cal.Rptr.2d 323 [observing that rapes consummated during the robbery of a bank appear to be a rarity]), ... ...
  • Mexicali Rose v. Superior Court
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • 23 janvier 1992
  • Alcaraz v. Vece
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • 31 janvier 1997
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Un-making Law: the Classical Revival in the Common Law
    • United States
    • Seattle University School of Law Seattle University Law Review No. 28-01, September 2004
    • Invalid date
    ...basis for liability). 165. Pruitt v. General Motors Corp, 86 Cal. Rptr. 2d 4 (Cal. App. 1999). 166. Mexicali Rose v. Superior Court, 822 P.2d 1292 (Cal. 167. Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability §2, cmt. f. (1998). 168. John W. Wade, On the Nature of Strict Tort Liability for Pr......
  • Unmaking and remaking tort law *.
    • United States
    • The Journal of High Technology Law Vol. 5 No. 1, January 2005
    • 1 janvier 2005
    ...(2000). (34.) E.g., Pruitt v. General Motors Corp, 86 Cal. Rptr. 2d 4 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999). (35.) E.g., Mexicali Rose v. Superior Court, 822 P.2d 1292 (Cal. (36.) Restatement (Third) of Torts: Prod. Liab. [section]2, cmt. f. (1998). (37.) Restatement (Third) of Torts: Prod. Liab. [section]2......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT