People v. Hodges

Citation58 A.D.3d 642,2009 NY Slip Op 00226,869 N.Y.S.2d 912
Decision Date13 January 2009
Docket Number2006-04588.,2007-06462.
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM HODGES, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress certain incriminating statements the defendant made to detectives during an interview. The credibility determinations of the hearing court are entitled to great deference on appeal, and its conclusions will not be set aside unless manifestly erroneous or unsupported by the record (see People v Rivera, 27 AD3d 489, 490 [2006]). The record supports the hearing court's determination to credit the detectives' testimony, which established that the defendant's right to counsel had not attached when the defendant made the statements to the detectives (see People v Jenneman, 37 AD3d 736, 737 [2007]). Furthermore, the defendant's contention that his due process rights were violated by the detectives' failure to videotape the interview is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Nelson, 52 AD3d 534, 535 [2008]; People v Rosas, 30 AD3d 545 [2006], affd 8 NY3d 493 [2007]).

The defendant's remaining contention has been rendered academic in light of our determination.

Concur: SPOLZINO, J.P., COVELLO, BALKIN and BELEN, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Hodges v. Bezio, 09-CV-3402 (ENV)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 14 Febrero 2012
    ...January 13, 2009, the Appellate Division found that the hearing court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. People v. Hodges. 58 A.D.3d 642, 869 N.Y.S.2d 912 (2d Dept.), appeal denied, 12 N.Y.3d 817, 908 N.E.2d 933, 881 N.Y.S.2d 25 (2009). The court noted that "[t]he credibility d......
  • Hodges v. Bezio
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 14 Febrero 2012
    ...January 13, 2009, the Appellate Division found that the hearing court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. People v. Hodges, 58 A.D.3d 642, 869 N.Y.S.2d 912 (2d Dept.), appeal denied, 12 N.Y.3d 817, 908 N.E.2d 933, 881 N.Y.S.2d 25 (2009). The court noted that "[t]he credibility d......
  • People v. Santiago
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 11 Julio 2012
    ...the 5:05 statement) and 8:07 P.M. (hereinafter the 8:07 statements), respectively, on the date of the homicide ( see People v. Hodges, 58 A.D.3d 642, 869 N.Y.S.2d 912;People v. Parsad, 243 A.D.2d 510, 662 N.Y.S.2d 835,cert. denied sub nom. Parsad v. Fischer, 540 U.S. 1091, 124 S.Ct. 962, 15......
  • People v. Thomas
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 27 Diciembre 2011
    ...granted 17 N.Y.3d 793, 929 N.Y.S.2d 101, 952 N.E.2d 1096; People v. Rodriguez, 68 A.D.3d 789, 789, 888 N.Y.S.2d 894; People v. Hodges, 58 A.D.3d 642, 642, 869 N.Y.S.2d 912; People v. Boyd, 21 A.D.3d 1428, 1429, 801 N.Y.S.2d 469; People v. Falkenstein, 288 A.D.2d 922, 923, 732 N.Y.S.2d 817).......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT