People v. Hoffman
| Decision Date | 19 April 1999 |
| Citation | 692 N.Y.S.2d 592,180 Misc.2d 382 |
| Parties | , The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Martin HOFFMAN, Appellant. . Second Department |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Term |
John J. Budnick, Wantagh, for appellant.
PRESENT: INGRASSIA, J.P., FLOYD and PALELLA, JJ.
Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed on the law and accusatory instrument dismissed.
The accusatory instrument charging defendant with violating section 345-16 of the Massapequa Park Code is jurisdictionally defective since every element of the offense charged is not supported by non-hearsay allegations of fact that establish, if true, every element of the offense (CPL 100.15; 100.40; People v. Alejandro, 70 N.Y.2d 133, 517 N.Y.S.2d 927, 511 N.E.2d 71). The allegations contained in the "information" are merely based upon information and belief of the complainant and upon village records and investigative reports. The allegations are insufficient to satisfy the statutory requirements of a jurisdictionally sufficient information. Even assuming arguendo that the instrument is a misdemeanor complaint, it too would be jurisdictionally defective since it fails to provide reasonable cause to believe that defendant committed the offense charged (CPL 100.40[b] ) and it does not contain evidentiary allegations which support or tend to support the charge (CPL 100.15). The mere allegation that defendant permitted two or more family units or separate housekeeping units to be maintained and that he permitted the cellar to be used and occupied as a habitable space for living and sleeping without further factual allegations establishing the basis for the complainants' conclusion is insufficient to establish reasonable cause to believe defendant committed the offense charged. In addition, it is noted that Section 345-16 of the Code does not restrict the use of the cellar.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Morales
...N.Y.S.2d 927, 511 N.E.2d 71 [1987] ; People v. Dumas , 68 N.Y.2d 729, 506 N.Y.S.2d 319, 497 N.E.2d 686 [1986] ; People v. Hoffman , 180 Misc. 2d 382, 383, 692 N.Y.S.2d 592 [App. Term, 9th & 10th Jud. Dists. 1999] ).Accordingly, defendant's motion to dismiss the accusatory instrument as faci......
-
People v. Wienclaw
...be "beyond a reasonable doubt" (People v Henderson, 92 NY2d 677 [1999]). The allegations must not be conclusory. (People v Hoffman, 180 Misc 2d 382 [App Term, 2d Dept 1999].) Failure to comply with any of the above requirements is considered a jurisdictional defect, and therefore the inform......
-
People v. 62 Gilbert St., LLC
...People v. Keizer, 100 N.Y.2d 114, 121 [2003] ; People v. Casey, 95 N.Y.2d at 354, 717 N.Y.S.2d 88, 740 N.E.2d 233 ; People v. Hoffman, 180 Misc.2d 382, 383, 692 N.Y.S.2d 592 [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 1999]; cf. People v. M. Santulli, LLC, 29 Misc.3d 54, 57, 910 N.Y.S.2d 336 [......
-
People v. Kerr
...(see People v Moore, 5 NY3d 725 [2005], supra; People v Alejandro, 70 NY2d 133 [1987]; People v Dumas, 68 NY2d 729 [1986]; People v Hoffman, 180 Misc 2d 382, 383 [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists In view of our disposition of this matter, we do not address any other issues. RUDOLPH, P.J., McC......