People v. Holt

Decision Date20 March 1986
Citation501 N.Y.S.2d 641,67 N.Y.2d 819,492 N.E.2d 769
Parties, 492 N.E.2d 769 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James HOLT, True Name Jerome Smith, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
OPINION OF THE COURTMEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division, 111 A.D.2d 706, 491 N.Y.S.2d 883, should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

Defendant was convicted of stabbing a man to death in a parking lot on West 39th Street, near 9th Avenue, in Manhattan, based upon the testimony of a single eyewitness.At trial, defendant testified that, at the time that the crime was committed, he was 11 blocks away, on West 50th Street, and that, earlier in the evening he had been walking on 8th Avenue, past 39th Street, one-half block from the parking lot, but was never closer than that to the crime scene.The trial court denied defendant's request for an alibi charge, without explanation.

This was error.As we noted in People v. Barbato, 254 N.Y. 170, 178-179, 172 N.E.2d 458."If the proof as to an alibi raises a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury as to whether the accused was present at the place and time where and when the crime was committed, the accused is entitled to have the defense fairly treated like any other defense and is not obliged to establish that it was impossible for him to commit the act charged.If under the evidence tending, if true, to prove an alibi, it may have been possible for the defendant to have committed the crime, it is still for the jury to determine whether, if the evidence is true, he availed himself of the possibility it afforded * * * If the proof as to an alibi, when taken into consideration...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
75 cases
  • People v. Holmes
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 26, 2018
    ...and therefore constituted improper implicit bolstering of the witness's identification testimony (see People v. Holt, 67 N.Y.2d 819, 821, 501 N.Y.S.2d 641, 492 N.E.2d 769 ; People v. Jones, 131 A.D.3d 1179, 1180, 16 N.Y.S.3d 328 ; People v. Rankins, 81 A.D.3d 857, 858, 916 N.Y.S.2d 618 ; Pe......
  • People v. Horton
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 5, 2020
    ...of any kind (compare People v. Smith, 22 N.Y.3d 462, 465–466, 982 N.Y.S.2d 809, 5 N.E.3d 972 [2013] ; People v. Holt, 67 N.Y.2d 819, 821, 501 N.Y.S.2d 641, 492 N.E.2d 769 [1986] ). The court likewise properly denied defendant's request for records of the victim's mental health counseling an......
  • Johnson v. State
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Delaware
    • September 9, 1989
    ...326 S.E.2d 748 (1985); People v. Billingsley, 184 Ill.App.3d 142, 132 Ill.Dec. 496, 539 N.E.2d 1302 (1989); People v. Holt, 67 N.Y.2d 819, 501 N.Y.S.2d 641, 492 N.E.2d 769 (1986); People v. Johnson, 57 N.Y.2d 969, 457 N.Y.S.2d 230, 443 N.E.2d 478 (1982). Many jurisdictions have recognized t......
  • People v. Salton
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 8, 2010
    ...were several instances where testimony by the prosecution's witnesses constituted implicit bolstering ( see People v. Holt, 67 N.Y.2d 819, 821, 501 N.Y.S.2d 641, 492 N.E.2d 769; People v. Samuels, 22 A.D.3d 507, 508, 802 N.Y.S.2d 458; People v. Fields, 309 A.D.2d 945, 766 N.Y.S.2d 365; Peop......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • D. Bolstering
    • United States
    • New York State Bar Association Practical Skills: Criminal Law & Practice (NY) VIII Motion To Suppress Evidence of An Identification
    • Invalid date
    ...jury evaluate the reliability of the witness's memory. --------Notes:[345] People v. Trowbridge, 305 N.Y. 471 (1953); see People v. Holt, 67 N.Y.2d 819, 501 N.Y.S.2d 641 (1986) (Officer's statement that, as a result of a conversation with the victim, he arrested the accused, was found impro......