People v. Holt
Decision Date | 20 March 1986 |
Citation | 501 N.Y.S.2d 641,67 N.Y.2d 819,492 N.E.2d 769 |
Parties | , 492 N.E.2d 769 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James HOLT, True Name Jerome Smith, Appellant. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division, 111 A.D.2d 706, 491 N.Y.S.2d 883, should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
Defendant was convicted of stabbing a man to death in a parking lot on West 39th Street, near 9th Avenue, in Manhattan, based upon the testimony of a single eyewitness.At trial, defendant testified that, at the time that the crime was committed, he was 11 blocks away, on West 50th Street, and that, earlier in the evening he had been walking on 8th Avenue, past 39th Street, one-half block from the parking lot, but was never closer than that to the crime scene.The trial court denied defendant's request for an alibi charge, without explanation.
This was error.As we noted in People v. Barbato, 254 N.Y. 170, 178-179, 172 N.E.2d 458....
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
People v. Holmes
...and therefore constituted improper implicit bolstering of the witness's identification testimony (see People v. Holt, 67 N.Y.2d 819, 821, 501 N.Y.S.2d 641, 492 N.E.2d 769 ; People v. Jones, 131 A.D.3d 1179, 1180, 16 N.Y.S.3d 328 ; People v. Rankins, 81 A.D.3d 857, 858, 916 N.Y.S.2d 618 ; Pe......
-
People v. Horton
...of any kind (compare People v. Smith, 22 N.Y.3d 462, 465–466, 982 N.Y.S.2d 809, 5 N.E.3d 972 [2013] ; People v. Holt, 67 N.Y.2d 819, 821, 501 N.Y.S.2d 641, 492 N.E.2d 769 [1986] ). The court likewise properly denied defendant's request for records of the victim's mental health counseling an......
-
Johnson v. State
...326 S.E.2d 748 (1985); People v. Billingsley, 184 Ill.App.3d 142, 132 Ill.Dec. 496, 539 N.E.2d 1302 (1989); People v. Holt, 67 N.Y.2d 819, 501 N.Y.S.2d 641, 492 N.E.2d 769 (1986); People v. Johnson, 57 N.Y.2d 969, 457 N.Y.S.2d 230, 443 N.E.2d 478 (1982). Many jurisdictions have recognized t......
-
People v. Salton
...were several instances where testimony by the prosecution's witnesses constituted implicit bolstering ( see People v. Holt, 67 N.Y.2d 819, 821, 501 N.Y.S.2d 641, 492 N.E.2d 769; People v. Samuels, 22 A.D.3d 507, 508, 802 N.Y.S.2d 458; People v. Fields, 309 A.D.2d 945, 766 N.Y.S.2d 365; Peop......
-
D. Bolstering
...jury evaluate the reliability of the witness's memory. --------Notes:[345] People v. Trowbridge, 305 N.Y. 471 (1953); see People v. Holt, 67 N.Y.2d 819, 501 N.Y.S.2d 641 (1986) (Officer's statement that, as a result of a conversation with the victim, he arrested the accused, was found impro......