People v. Irizzary

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
Writing for the CourtBefore THOMPSON
Citation125 A.D.2d 589,509 N.Y.S.2d 652
Decision Date22 December 1986
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Ramon IRIZZARY, Appellant.

Page 652

509 N.Y.S.2d 652
125 A.D.2d 589
The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent,
v.
Ramon IRIZZARY, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division,
Second Department.
Dec. 22, 1986.

Anthony Allan D'Amore, New York City, for appellant.

Elizabeth Holtzman, Dist. Atty., Brooklyn (Barbara D. Underwood and Anthea H. Bruffee, of counsel), for respondent.

Before THOMPSON, J.P., and NIEHOFF, WEINSTEIN, KUNZEMAN and SPATT, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bonomo, J.), rendered October 27, 1983, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Page 653

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the defendant's request to withdraw his plea on the grounds that he was mentally unfit, that he was innocent and that he was forced to plead guilty because of his attorney's incompetence, was without merit (CPL 220.60 People v. Pica, 112 A.D.2d 325, 491 N.Y.S.2d 775; People v. Stubbs, 110 A.D.2d 725, 727, 487 N.Y.S.2d 824; People v. Kelsch, 96 A.D.2d 677, 678, 466 N.Y.S.2d 535). In view of the complete allocution of the defendant's plea before the same Judge who presided at sentencing and the fact that the defendant made no showing in support of his conclusory assertions, Criminal Term properly proceeded to impose sentence without making any further inquiry (see, People v. Brown, 110 A.D.2d 902, 903, 489 N.Y.S.2d 4).

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • People v. Doherty
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 23 Noviembre 1987
    ...denied the effective assistance of counsel (People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 410 N.Y.S.2d 555, 382 N.E.2d 1332; People v. Irizzary, 125 A.D.2d 589, 509 N.Y.S.2d 652, lv. denied 69 N.Y.2d 829, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1036, 506 N.E.2d 547). The record indicates that the defendant knowingly, voluntari......
  • People v. Rivera
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 18 Noviembre 1991
    ...claim, his conclusory allegation of being unable to comprehend the proceedings was unsupported by the evidence (see, People v. Irizzary, 125 A.D.2d 589, 509 N.Y.S.2d 652). Thus, the court's decision to deny the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea was a proper exercise of discretion and ......
  • People v. McNair, 1
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 7 Octubre 1992
    ...(see, People v. Barnett, 136 A.D.2d 555, 523 N.Y.S.2d 174, lv. denied 71 N.Y.2d 966, 529 N.Y.S.2d 77, 524 N.E.2d 431; People v. Irizzary, 125 A.D.2d 589, 509 N.Y.S.2d 652; lv. denied 69 N.Y.2d 829, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1036, 506 N.E.2d 547). Moreover, because defendant was afforded a reasonable opp......
  • People v. Ochoa
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 13 Enero 1992
    ...the defendant's conclusory allegation of being unable to comprehend the proceedings supported by any evidence (see, People v. Irizzary, 125 A.D.2d 589, 509 N.Y.S.2d 652). Moreover, following the defendant's assertions, the court afforded his attorney an opportunity to be heard. Having provi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT