People v. Jackson

Decision Date02 June 1966
Citation271 N.Y.S.2d 268,17 N.Y.2d 817
Parties, 218 N.E.2d 311 PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Edmund JACKSON, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, 24 A.D.2d 555, 260 N.Y.S.2d 827.

Defendant was arraigned, and counsel was assigned to appear for him. At his request an adjournment was granted so that he could retain counsel of his own choice. When the case was called for trial the defendant, who had not procured counsel, stated that he would like to be relieved of counsel who had been assigned to appear for him and that he did not wish to go to trial with counsel assigned to him. The court however directed the defendant to go to trial with the assigned counsel.

Defendant was convicted of the sale of narcotics in violation of the Penal Law, Consol. Laws, c. 40, § 1751, subd. 1.

The Supreme Court, Bronx County, Frederick Backer, J., entered judgment, and the defendant appealed.

The Appellate Division entered a judgment affirming the judgment of the Supreme Court.

The defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals by permission of Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals, contending that he had been denied his constitutional right to dispense with assigned counsel and to defend himself or to be informed of his right to defend himself.

Judgment affirmed.

All concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • United States ex rel. Jackson v. Follette, 201
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • April 30, 1970
    ...Division, First Judicial Department, People v. Jackson, 24 A.D. 2d 555, 260 N.Y.S.2d 827 (1966), and by the Court of Appeals, 17 N.Y.2d 817 (1966). By his petition Jackson sought to have his state court conviction set aside on the ground that it was obtained in violation of the rights secur......
  • People ex rel. Green v. Nenna
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 2, 1966
  • People v. Henry
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • June 13, 2013
    ...conviction and sentence and both were affirmed by the Appellate Division (80 A.D.2d 625). The Court of Appeals denied leave to appeal (17 N.Y.2d 817) and his federal habeas corpus petition is pending. Since the sentence imposed was within the statutory parameters established by the New York......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT