People v. Jackson, Docket No. 8619
| Citation | 185 N.W.2d 608,29 Mich.App. 654 |
| Decision Date | 21 January 1971 |
| Docket Number | No. 2,Docket No. 8619,2 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ollie JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Michigan (US) |
Irving W. Goldsmith, Goldsmith & Shapiro, Warren, for defendant-appellant.
Frank J. Kelley, Atty.Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Sol.Gen., George N. Parris, Pros.Atty., Thaddeus F. Hamera, Chief Appellate Lawyer, Stephen F. Osinksi, Asst.Pros.Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before BRONSON, P.J., and R. B. BURNS and HOFF, * JJ.
Defendant, convicted by a jury of larceny in a building (M.C.L.A. § 750.360 (Stat.Ann.1954 Rev. § 28.592)), was sentenced to a prison term of two to four years. Undisputed testimony established that defendant entered a retail store, put on a leather jacket valued at $55.95, put his own coat over the leather jacket, and was subsequently arrested attempting to leave the store. Defendant admits his theft of the jacket but claims he was charged and convicted of the wrong crime. Defendant contends that the legislature enacted M.C.L.A. § 750.356 (Stat.Ann.1970 Cum.Supp. § 28.588), which makes larceny a misdemeanor when stolen property is valued at $100 or less, to soften the harshness of the larceny-in-a-building offense, Supra, which makes all larceny a felony. Defendant argues that the conviction under the felony offense of larceny, when the stolen property is valued as $100 or less, is contrary to legislative intent. We do not accept defendant's interpretation.
Defendant would be guilty under either of the larceny statutes. The legislature has obviously decided that larceny in a building presents a social problem separate and apart from simple larceny and that all larcenies in a building, value being irrelevant deserve felony status. See Black v. Gladden (1964), 237 Or. 631, 393 P.2d 190.
The decision to charge the defendant with the felony instead of a misdemeanor is in the sound discretion of the prosecuting attorney. People v. Lombardo (1942), 301 Mich. 451, 3 N.W.2d 839; People v. Birmingham (1968), 13 Mich.App. 402, 164 N.W.2d 561; People v. Eineder (1969), 16 Mich.App. 270, 167 N.W.2d 893.
Defendant's arguments that the felony-larceny statute is vague and uncertain and that he was denied equal protection of the laws are without merit. It is clearly within the discretion of the legislature to distinguish simple larceny and larceny in a building as separate social evils.
Defendant's further argument...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Fields
...224--225 (1969).20 Compare Genesee Prosecutor v. Genesee Circuit Judge, 386 Mich. 672, 683, 194 N.W.2d 693 (1972); People v. Jackson, 29 Mich.App. 654, 185 N.W.2d 608 (1971); People v. Graves, 31 Mich.App. 635, 188 N.W.2d 87 (1971); Contrast People v. Mire, 173 Mich. 357, 138 N.W. 1066 ...
-
People v. Ford
...contrary. 9 Two cases in particular have considered the matter directly and thoughtfully. The seminal case of People v. Jackson, 29 Mich.App. 654, 655-656, 185 N.W.2d 608 (1971), after setting forth the facts succinctly, covered most of the arguments raised in this "Defendant argues that th......
-
People v. Page
...and entering charge, and, furthermore, value is not a required element of a larceny from a building charge. People v. Jackson, 29 Mich.App. 654, 185 N.W.2d 608 (1971), People v. Graves, 31 Mich.App. 635, 188 N.W.2d 87 (1971), People v. Midgyett, 49 Mich.App. 663, 212 N.W.2d 754 (1973), Peop......
-
People v. Evans, Docket No. 78-474
...People v. Bohm, 49 Mich.App. 244, 212 N.W.2d 61 (1973); People v. Graves, 31 Mich.App. 635, 188 N.W.2d 87 (1971); People v. Jackson, 29 Mich.App. 654, 185 N.W.2d 608 (1971). 5 We are not convinced that this position is wrong. The existence of at least two offenses covering the defendant's c......