People v. Jaimes

Decision Date06 November 2014
Docket NumberNo. 2–12–1368.,2–12–1368.
Citation21 N.E.3d 501
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Ricardo JAIMES, Defendant–Appellant.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

Amanda N. Graham, of Amanda Graham Law, LLC, of Chicago, for appellant.

Joseph P. Bruscato, State's Attorney, of Rockford (Lawrence M. Bauer and Victoria E. Jozef, both of State's Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor's Office, of counsel), for the People.

OPINION

Justice SCHOSTOK

delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion.

¶ 1 Following a jury trial, the defendant, Ricardo Jaimes, was convicted of first degree murder (720 ILCS 5/9–1(a)(1)

(West 2010)) and attempted first-degree murder (720 ILCS 5/8–4(a), 9–1(a)(1), (West 2010)). He was sentenced to a total of 70 years' imprisonment. On appeal, the defendant argues that: (1) he was not convicted beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) the trial court erred in admitting gang-related evidence; and (3) he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

¶ 2 BACKGROUND

¶ 3 On June 23, 2010, the defendant and his brother Isaac were charged by indictment with the first-degree murder (720 ILCS 5/9–1(a)(1)

, (a)(2), (a)(3) (West 2010)) of Demarkis Robinson and the attempted first-degree murder (720 ILCS 5/8–4(a), 9–1(a)(1) (West 2010)) of William Patrick. The trial court granted the defendant's motion to sever the brothers' trials.

¶ 4 Between September 24 and 27, 2012, the trial court conducted a jury trial. The State's evidence established that Patrick had prior convictions of mob action and possession of a firearm without a firearm owner's identification (FOID) card and that he was a member of the Insane Unknowns street gang. That gang was a rival of the Latin Kings. Robinson was his close friend and also a member of the Insane Unknowns.

¶ 5 On May 27, 2010, Patrick and his aunt, Wanda Perez, were visiting his grandmother's house at 1129 6th Avenue in Rockford. Robinson was also there. Robinson spent time on the front porch with Patrick, Perez, and other family members. While on the porch, Perez noticed a gray Tahoe sport utility vehicle (SUV) quickly approach and then stop near the 8th Street and 6th Avenue intersection. Because its approach grabbed her attention, she told Patrick and Robinson to watch the SUV. Patrick watched it drive past the house slowly, with the driver's side of the vehicle facing the house. Perez momentarily played with her phone, but when she looked up she noticed the driver make a hand gesture with two fingers pointing downward. Perez did not closely view the vehicle's occupants. Perez believed that the gesture was a gang sign. Both Robinson and Patrick were present when the gesture was made. Patrick explained that the hand gesture was an act of disrespect to the Insane Unknowns. Then, Patrick observed the driver display a gang sign for the Latin Kings. Patrick testified that the driver's hand gestures were grounds to start a fight.

¶ 6 Patrick took his nieces into the house because “anything could start to happen.” The Tahoe was traveling toward 7th Street, but Robinson and Patrick walked toward 9th Street. Shortly after Robinson and Patrick left, Perez heard what sounded like one close gunshot. She then called Robinson's father, Samuel, and told him that she heard a gunshot and that Robinson and Patrick were running toward his house. The call was made at 3 p.m.

¶ 7 Patrick and Robinson passed through an alley and turned onto 5th Avenue. When they exited the alley 15 to 20 minutes after first seeing the Tahoe, Patrick, while speaking on his phone, saw the Tahoe, with the same driver, pass them very slowly. Patrick observed that the passenger had a bandana around his face, which signified to Patrick that the occupants of the Tahoe were going to start shooting. Patrick picked up a brick and threw it at the Tahoe so that it would keep moving. Geraldine Horton was walking by as this occurred. (Horton had previously been convicted of drug-related charges and she had other charges pending against her.) She heard glass break and saw the SUV stop a few feet before a stop sign. Lacressa Dangel was driving by as this occurred. (Dangel had previously been convicted of prostitution, theft, and drug-related charges. She also had traffic charges pending against her.) Dangel felt and saw something hit the back of her car on her northbound journey along 9th Street, between 2:45 and 3 p.m. She stopped her car north of 5th Avenue and saw a silver SUV facing west on 5th Avenue. She observed the scene unfold through her rearview mirror.

¶ 8 Horton, Patrick, and Dangel watched as: (1) the Tahoe's passenger door opened; (2) a passenger exited and walked toward the back of the vehicle; and (3) the passenger used two hands to hold, point, and fire a firearm four or five times. Dangel believed that the gun looked like a skinny BB gun and that the shooter was a Hispanic male. Patrick believed that the firearm looked like a rifle, and he heard five to eight shots fired. He ducked behind a tree, and Robinson veered off into an alleyway.

¶ 9 After the passenger stopped firing, he returned inside the waiting vehicle, and the vehicle sped off down 5th Avenue. Horton saw the driver as he passed; his eyes were wide open, and he gripped the steering wheel with locked and tensed arms. Horton later told the police that the driver looked scared. At trial, she testified that the driver was surprised to see her. She described both the driver and the passenger as Hispanic.

¶ 10 In response to the phone call from Perez, Samuel ran toward the area where the shots were fired. About 15 to 20 minutes later, Samuel found Robinson's shirt and then saw Robinson lying naked under a faucet. Samuel picked up the clothing from the yard and brought it to his son. Samuel saw that Robinson was in and out of consciousness and he called 911. Robinson then told Samuel, “that damn Richard shot me.” From a previous discussion with his son, Samuel had learned that Richard and Robinson had been in a fight at Rockford East High School, Richard was a Latin King who attended East High School, and Robinson had encountered Richard at Perez's mother's house a month before the shooting.

¶ 11 Police officers responded to the scene and discovered five spent .22–caliber shell casings in the street. The casings were run over and deformed, but they were in a small grouping. Robinson was transported to Swedish American Hospital, where he was pronounced dead.

¶ 12 On May 28, 2010, Dr. Mark Peters performed an autopsy on Robinson. Dr. Peters opined that Robinson died of a gunshot wound

to the abdomen that caused internal bleeding, hemorrhagic shock, and blood loss. Though such an injury could cause instant death, a person could walk and live with such an injury for 30 minutes before dying. Dr. Peters recovered from Robinson's body a bullet that appeared consistent with .22–caliber ammunition.

¶ 13 On May 28, 2010, Patrick spoke to Rockford police officers about the incident and gave his statement. He was upset, shaking, and crying. In his statement, Patrick did not mention that he threw a brick at the silver Tahoe or that Robinson walked up to the vehicle and spoke to the occupants. Though he had not seen the driver before, Patrick knew that the driver was a Latin King, based upon the display of the Latin Kings' gang sign. From a photo array, Patrick identified the defendant as the driver of the Tahoe and Isaac as the shooter.

¶ 14 Also on May 28, 2010, Rockford police officers interviewed Dangel. She identified Isaac as the shooter. She was not able to identify the driver of the vehicle.

¶ 15 On May 29, 2010, the police arrested both the defendant and Isaac. The police discovered the defendant's Tahoe at the house where he was arrested. When the Tahoe was inspected, the police found a spent .22–caliber casing under the rear passenger seat.

¶ 16 Patrick and Perez subsequently identified the defendant's Tahoe as the one they saw on the day of the shooting. Both Horton and Dangel told the police that the defendant's Tahoe looked like the one involved in the shooting.

¶ 17 Illinois State Police forensic scientist David Welte compared the five spent cartridges found on the street with the one found in the Tahoe. He concluded that all six casings were fired from the same .22–caliber firearm. Although he determined that the bullet recovered from Robinson was the same caliber as the six casings, he could not determine if it was fired from the same firearm, because, as the firearm used in the shooting was never recovered, he was not able to compare it to that firearm.

¶ 18 On February 7, 2011, Patrick went to the office of the defendant's attorney, David Vella. He was accompanied by someone who identified himself as a Vice Lord from Chicago. Patrick told Vella that the written statement he had given to the police was false and that he had laughed when it was read. He told Vella that he could not identify the driver or the shooter, because hoods and masks covered their faces. At trial, Patrick testified that his statement to Vella was false and that he had made it because he had been threatened.

¶ 19 In September 2012, Patrick told an assistant State's Attorney that he did not want to testify. Patrick explained that people had threatened him. He was concerned about his safety. Patrick indicated that he could still identify the driver of the Tahoe from a photo array, but not the shooter. (At trial, he testified that he could identify the shooter as well.) Patrick also made no reference to Robinson talking to the occupants of the Tahoe. (At trial, he testified that Robinson and the occupants said a couple of words when the vehicle first pulled up.)

¶ 20 The State introduced evidence that the defendant was a Latin King. Specifically, Gary Anderson, a Winnebago County corrections officer, said that the defendant told him that he was a Latin King and that he needed to be segregated from other gangs. The State also introduced testimony from Rockford police...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • People v. Martinez
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • March 16, 2021
  • People v. Carr-McKnight
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • August 13, 2020
    ...the State still must prove that a first degree murder occurred (see People v. Jaimes , 2014 IL App (2d) 121368, ¶ 38, 386 Ill.Dec. 738, 21 N.E.3d 501 ), though the State does not always need to prove who amongst the co-offenders shot the firearm. See People v. Cooper , 194 Ill. 2d 419, 435,......
  • People v. Williams
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • September 30, 2016
    ...does not excuse the State from proving the elements of first degree murder. See People v. Jaimes, 2014 IL App (2d) 121368, ¶ 38, 386 Ill.Dec. 738, 21 N.E.3d 501 (to obtain conviction based on accountability, State must prove that principal actually committed offense). That element of intent......
  • People v. Murray
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • December 13, 2017
    ...criminal intent of the principal or that there was a common criminal design. People v. Jaimes , 2014 IL App (2d) 121368, ¶ 37, 386 Ill.Dec. 738, 21 N.E.3d 501. ¶ 48 Defendant argues that the only "first-hand" accounts of the shooting were given by Cox and himself. Defendant asserts that the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT