People v. Johnson

Decision Date19 August 2020
Docket Number2019–00966,Ind. No. 18-00208
Parties The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Antoine JOHNSON, appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

186 A.D.3d 743
127 N.Y.S.3d 292 (Mem)

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,
v.
Antoine JOHNSON, appellant.

2019–00966
Ind.
No. 18-00208

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Submitted—January 10, 2020
August 19, 2020


Michele Marte–Indzonka, Newburgh, NY, for appellant.

David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (William C. Ghee of counsel), for respondent.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

127 N.Y.S.3d 293

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Craig Stephen Brown, J.), rendered November 20, 2018, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited review of any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel that did not directly involve the plea-negotiation process and sentence (see People v. Petgen, 55 N.Y.2d 529, 535 n 3, 450 N.Y.S.2d 299, 435 N.E.2d 669 ; People v. Parker, 176 A.D.3d 1106, 1107, 112 N.Y.S.3d 777 ; People v. Brown, 170 A.D.3d 878, 879, 96 N.Y.S.3d 110 ; People v. Fakhoury, 103 A.D.3d 664, 959 N.Y.S.2d 269 ; People v. Opoku, 61 A.D.3d 705, 876 N.Y.S.2d 493 ). To the extent that the defendant contends that ineffective assistance of counsel affected the voluntariness of his plea, the record demonstrates that he received an advantageous plea, and nothing in the record casts doubt on the effectiveness of counsel (see People v. Brown, 170 A.D.3d at 879, 96 N.Y.S.3d 110 ; People v. Soria, 99 A.D.3d 1027, 1028, 952 N.Y.S.2d 300 ; People v. Yarborough, 83 A.D.3d 875, 920 N.Y.S.2d 681 ). Furthermore, the defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is refuted by the record of the plea proceeding, in which he acknowledged that he had been afforded sufficient time to consult with his attorney and was satisfied with his attorney's representation, that he...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • People v. Jhagroo
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 19, 2020
  • People v. Yoo
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 21, 2022
    ...he was entering into the plea freely and voluntarily (see People v. Rodriquez, 194 A.D.3d at 1079, 144 N.Y.S.3d 611 ; People v. Johnson, 186 A.D.3d 743, 744, 127 N.Y.S.3d 292 ). "The mere fact that defense counsel may have advised the defendant as to the risks of trial," including the possi......
  • People v. Chacon-Diaz
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 9, 2022
  • People v. Braunskill
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 15, 2022
    ... ... A.D.3d 1097, 1097) ...          The ... defendant's contention that the Supreme Court failed to ... fully comply with CPL 400.15 and 400.21 before sentencing him ... as a second violent felony offender also is unpreserved for ... appellate review (see People v Johnson, 186 A.D.3d ... 743, 744; People v Smothers, 175 A.D.3d 1441, 1442; ... People v Sutton, 161 A.D.3d 783, 784). In any event, ... the court substantially complied with the statutes (see ... People v Johnson, 186 A.D.3d at 744; People v ... Rogers, 173 A.D.3d 775, 776; People v Giddens, ... 161 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT