People v. Johnson
| Decision Date | 25 February 1993 |
| Citation | 81 N.Y.2d 828,595 N.Y.S.2d 385,611 N.E.2d 286 |
| Parties | , 611 N.E.2d 286 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert JOHNSON, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, defendant's motion to suppress the showup identification granted, and a new trial ordered.
On September 28, 1988, at about noon, the complainant, a postman, was approached from behind and robbed of a gold chain and pendant as he delivered mail in the lobby of an apartment building at 240 Park Hill Avenue in Richmond County. The complainant had observed no one in the lobby of the apartment building when he entered. During the robbery the complainant felt a sharp object in his back and heard someone say " 'Don't move, I am just taking your chain.' " The perpetrator fled from the building after taking the chain and the complainant chased him. During the pursuit, the complainant observed that the perpetrator carried a knife in his right hand and looked back on several occasions. After a brief chase, the perpetrator scaled a fence and ran into an adjacent parking lot. The complainant abandoned the pursuit and resumed delivering the mail.
The complainant then reported the incident to a security guard at the apartment building and described the perpetrator to him. Several police officers arrived at the building and drove the complainant around the neighborhood, but after 15 to 20 minutes without finding the perpetrator, the complainant returned to the Stapleton Post Office.
Later that day, the police observed defendant near his home, which was also close to the crime scene. Defendant ran when he saw the police but was soon apprehended. The police brought him to the crime scene. At approximately 2:30 P.M., police officers transported the complainant from the Post Office back to the apartment building. On the way, the police told the complainant that they knew the name of the person who had robbed him, "had a suspect in custody," and were taking the complainant back to the crime scene "for a positive ID." The complainant was seated in the rear of an unmarked vehicle when a uniformed police officer escorted defendant, in handcuffs and civilian clothing, out of the apartment building. The complainant identified defendant, whom he had never before seen, as the person who had earlier taken his property.
Defendant moved to suppress the showup identification, arguing that it was "so tainted by suggestible police conduct as to make the ID of the defendant by the victim unreliable," but the hearing court denied his motion.
The identification was introduced at trial, and the complainant also made an in-court identification of defendant as the perpetrator. De...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Dunbar
...used is not unduly suggestive (see People v. Brisco, 99 N.Y.2d 596, 758 N.Y.S.2d 262, 788 N.E.2d 611; People v. Johnson, 81 N.Y.2d 828, 831, 595 N.Y.S.2d 385, 611 N.E.2d 286; People v. Fox, 11 A.D.3d 709, 784 N.Y.S.2d 565). Here, the showup identification was conducted shortly after the inc......
-
People v. Cruz
...suggestive by their very nature (People v. Ortiz, 90 N.Y.2d 533, 664 N.Y.S.2d 243, 686 N.E.2d 1337 [1997] ; People v. Johnson, 81 N.Y.2d 828, 595 N.Y.S.2d 385, 611 N.E.2d 286 [1993] ; People v. Riley, 70 N.Y.2d 523, 522 N.Y.S.2d 842, 517 N.E.2d 520 [1987] ). However, they are not presumptiv......
-
People v. Hines
... ... 484 [2d Dept ]; People v Gil, 21 A.D.3d 1120, 1121 ... [2d Dept 2005]; People v Green, 10 A.D.3d ... 664 [2d Dept 2004]; People v Holland, 4 A.D.3d 375, ... 376 [2d Dept 2004]; People v Private, 259 A.D.2d 504 ... [2d Dept 1999]; People v Johnson, 244 A.D.2d 573 [2d ... Dept 1997]). While there were questions on cross examination ... as to whether or not the defendant was handcuffed during the ... brief period of time in which he was waiting for the ... identifying witness to be transported for the showup, such ... ...
-
People v. Gee
...it unnecessarily suggestive for police to display defendant by himself or to show a single photograph of defendant (see, e.g., People v Johnson, 81 N.Y.2d 828, 831; People v Pries, 206 A.D.2d 873, 873-874), and seeks reversal of his conviction and remittal for a hearing to establish whether......