People v. Jones
| Decision Date | 16 June 2022 |
| Docket Number | 112169 |
| Citation | 206 A.D.3d 1292,170 N.Y.S.3d 326 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Warren JONES, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Mitchell S. Kessler, Cohoes, for appellant.
Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Peter H. Willis of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Ceresia, JJ.
Ceresia, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Sypniewski, J.), rendered August 12, 2019, convicting defendant following a nonjury trial of the crimes of assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, assault in the third degree and menacing in the third degree.
Defendant was charged in an indictment with assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, assault in the third degree and menacing in the third degree. After a nonjury trial, defendant was convicted of all counts and sentenced to an aggregate prison term of seven years followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.
Defendant's sole argument on appeal is that the weight of the evidence failed to support either assault conviction because there was insufficient proof that the victim sustained a physical injury due to the attack. "When undertaking a weight of the evidence review, we must first determine whether, based on all the credible evidence, a different finding would not have been unreasonable and then, if not, weigh the relative probative force of conflicting testimony and the relative strength of conflicting inferences that may be drawn from the testimony to determine if the verdict is supported by the weight of the evidence" ( People v. Dawson, 195 A.D.3d 1157, 1160, 149 N.Y.S.3d 362 [2021] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citations omitted], affd ––– N.Y.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, ––– N.E.3d ––––, 2022 WL 1216195, 2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 02772 [Apr. 26, 2022] ). Physical injury is defined as "impairment of physical condition or substantial pain" ( Penal Law § 10.00[9] ). "Pertinent factors in identifying a physical injury include the injury viewed objectively, the victim's subjective description of the injury and his or her pain, and whether the victim sought medical treatment" ( People v. Hicks, 128 A.D.3d 1221, 1222, 9 N.Y.S.3d 474 [2015] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted], lv denied 26 N.Y.3d 930, 17 N.Y.S.3d 93, 38 N.E.3d 839 [2015] ). "To meet the statutory pain threshold, the pain must be ‘more than slight or trivial’ but need not be ‘severe or intense’ " ( id ., quoting People v. Chiddick, 8 N.Y.3d 445, 447, 834 N.Y.S.2d 710, 866 N.E.2d 1039 [2007] ). "Whether the substantial pain necessary to establish an assault charge has been proved is generally a question for the trier of fact" ( People v. Rojas, 61 N.Y.2d 726, 727, 472 N.Y.S.2d 615, 460 N.E.2d 1100 [1984] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; accord People v. Huddleston, 196 A.D.3d 1098, 1099, 150 N.Y.S.3d 480 [2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 1060, 154 N.Y.S.3d 635, 176 N.E.3d 671 [2021] ).
The charged conduct occurred in the early morning hours on a sidewalk outside a convenience store. Surveillance video shows that, at 2:19 a.m., defendant approached the victim, who was sitting in a doorway, and punched her 11 times. After walking away and then returning to speak with the victim multiple times, defendant was observed on the video at 2:22 a.m. removing an object from his pocket, grabbing the victim's head, and repeatedly swinging the object toward the victim. Although the victim leaned back into the doorway such that most of her body was not visible on camera, the victim testified that defendant struck her numerous times with a screwdriver in the head and face while telling her that he could kill her.
As a preliminary matter, contrary to defendant's contention, the two assault charges did not both stem from the screwdriver incident. Count three charged defendant with assault in the third degree for causing physical injury at 2:19 a.m., and, as noted above, the video shows defendant punching the victim at that time. Count one, on the other hand, charged defendant with assault in the second degree for causing physical injury with a screwdriver at 2:22 a.m., which is supported by the video.
Turning to the count of assault in the third degree, the video depicted defendant leaning over the seated victim and punching her 11...
To continue reading
Request your trial