People v. Jones, 4748.

Decision Date30 November 2004
Docket Number4748.
Citation2004 NY Slip Op 08792,12 A.D.3d 315,784 N.Y.S.2d 866
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LINDALE JONES, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

The court properly imposed a prison sentence pursuant to defendant's plea agreement after defendant concededly violated that agreement by leaving a drug program without permission and thereby forfeited his opportunity for a more lenient disposition (see e.g. People v Felipe, 309 AD2d 514 [2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 571 [2003]). Defendant's contention that the court unlawfully abdicated its sentencing discretion to the prosecutor is unpreserved (see People v Baez, 216 AD2d 121 [1995]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that it is unsupported by the record, which reveals that the court heard arguments from both sides and accepted the People's argument that defendant, having unjustifiably absconded from the program, did not deserve a second chance.

Concur — Buckley, P.J., Williams, Lerner, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT