People v. Jones
| Decision Date | 24 June 2002 |
| Citation | 744 N.Y.S.2d 877,295 A.D.2d 625 |
| Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>MARTINEZ JONES, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).
The defendant has not, nor could he have, raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
People v. Patel
...1324 ; People v. Martin, 100 A.D.3d 930, 930, 953 N.Y.S.2d 893 ; People v. Vines, 51 A.D.3d 827, 859 N.Y.S.2d 661 ; People v. Joyner, 295 A.D.2d 625, 744 N.Y.S.2d 877 ). Moreover, any potential prejudice to the defendant was alleviated by the trial court's limiting instructions to the jury ......
-
People v. Martin
...v. Melendez, 55 N.Y.2d 445, 451–453, 449 N.Y.S.2d 946, 434 N.E.2d 1324;People v. Vines, 51 A.D.3d 827, 859 N.Y.S.2d 661;People v. Joyner, 295 A.D.2d 625, 744 N.Y.S.2d 877). Moreover, any potential prejudice to the defendant was alleviated by the trial court's limiting instructions to the ju......
- People v. Hafeez