People v. Jones

Decision Date31 January 1959
Citation15 Misc.2d 647,185 N.Y.S.2d 827
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of New York v. Robert D. JONES, Defendant.
CourtNew York County Court

John M. Liddy, District Attorney, Arthur A. Darrigrand, Asst. Dist. Atty., Utica, for the People, in opposition.

Stephen A. Gigliotti, Utica, for defendant.

JOHN J. WALSH, Judge.

Motion for a Bill of Particulars in the above-entitled case (robbery in the first degree) is granted as to the following:

1. The exact time and place where the alleged performance of the robbery in the first degree mentioned in the indictment herein occurred.

2. The name of the alleged accomplice.

4. The exact personal property alleged to have been taken from Marjorie B. Cline.

The following items are evidentiary in nature:

3. The manner or manners in which the said defendant was aided by an accomplice.

5. The act or acts of force and violence used by the defendant.

As to items 3 and 5, the motion is denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • People v. Ricci
    • United States
    • New York County Court
    • 11 Marzo 1969
    ... ...         As to the various items asked for, the following is the ruling: ...         Items a(1), (3); b(1), (3); c(1), (3) ...         This court has followed the practice of allowing a defendant more definite information as to time and place. People v. Jones ... (1959) 15 Misc.2d 647, 185 N.Y.S.2d 827. The word 'exact' should be interpreted to mean 'approximated within a reasonable degree of exactitude.' People v. Kamps, 4 Misc.2d 518, 519, 161 N.Y.S.2d 211, 212 ...         The above items are granted to the extent only of requiring the ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT