People v. Joseph
| Decision Date | 23 November 2011 |
| Citation | 89 A.D.3d 1324,932 N.Y.S.2d 918,2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 08507 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,v.Tyrelle JOSEPH, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HEREDavid Perino, Albany, for appellant.Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Gerald A. Dwyer of counsel), for respondent.Before: MERCURE, J.P., SPAIN, LAHTINEN, MALONE JR. and EGAN JR., JJ.LAHTINEN, J.
Appeal from a decision of the County Court of Schenectady County (Giardino, J.), dated May 25, 2010, which denied defendant's application to be resentenced under the Drug Law Reform Act of 2009.
Defendant was convicted in 2004 of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentenced to a prison term of 3 to 9 years. In 2010, defendant applied to be resentenced under the Drug Law Reform Act of 2009 (L. 2009, ch. 56, as codified in CPL 440.46). At the conclusion of the hearing that followed, County Court issued a bench decision denying the application, and defendant now appeals.
The record contains no written order denying defendant's application for resentencing. We have recently held that in the absence of an appealable paper, we are without jurisdiction to consider defendant's appeal ( see People v. Buckery, 84 A.D.3d 1588, 1589, 922 N.Y.S.2d 826 [2011] ). The appeal is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to County Court for the issuance of the required order ( see id.; People v. Peck, 46 A.D.3d 1098, 1099, 847 N.Y.S.2d 734 [2007] ).
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, and matter remitted to the County Court of Schenectady County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.
MERCURE, J.P., SPAIN, MALONE JR. and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Scott
...written order nor an appealable paper (cf. People v. Ward, 139 A.D.3d 1254, 1255, 30 N.Y.S.3d 582 [2016] ; People v. Joseph, 89 A.D.3d 1324, 1324–1325, 932 N.Y.S.2d 918 [2011] ). Notably, neither the transcript of the court's bench decision nor the standard form designating defendant's risk......
-
People v. Allen
...to consider defendant's appeal ( see People v. Barnett, 99 A.D.3d 1030, 1031, 951 N.Y.S.2d 919 [2012];People v. Joseph, 89 A.D.3d 1324, 1325, 932 N.Y.S.2d 918 [2011];People v. Buckery, 84 A.D.3d 1588, 1589, 922 N.Y.S.2d 826 [2011] ). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, and the matter is r......
-
People v. Jesus Lasanta Jr.
...89 A.D.3d 1324932 N.Y.S.2d 9172011 N.Y. Slip Op. 08506The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,v.Jesus LaSANTA Jr., Appellant.Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.Nov. 23, Andrew Kossover, Public Defender, Kingston (Mari Ann Connolly Sennett of counsel), for ......