People v. Kazepis

Decision Date07 May 1984
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Thomas KAZEPIS, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Philip L. Tomach, Rockville Centre, for appellant. Denis Dillon, Dist. Atty., Mineola (George Freed, Mineola, of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Delin, J.), imposed October 6, 1983, upon his plea of guilty to criminal sale of marijuana in the fourth degree, the sentence being a definite term of imprisonment of six months. Sentence affirmed, and this case is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd. 5). Defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed. Under the circumstances of this case, defendant has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive.

MOLLEN, P.J., and LAZER, BROWN and EIBER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
469 cases
  • People v. Sumahit
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 20, 2010
    ...N.Y.S.2d 724; People v. Fanelli, 8 A.D.3d 296, 777 N.Y.S.2d 320; People v. Mejia, 6 A.D.3d 630, 631, 774 N.Y.S.2d 801; People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816, 475 N.Y.S.2d 351. In any event, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675). MASTRO, J......
  • People v. Ronconi
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 21, 2011
    ...( see People v. Butler, 49 A.D.3d at 895, 854 N.Y.S.2d 506; People v. Aloisi, 177 A.D.2d 491, 492, 576 N.Y.S.2d 31; People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816, 817, 475 N.Y.S.2d 351). In any event, the enhanced sentence was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d...
  • People v. Shell
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 18, 2010
    ...N.Y.S.2d 724; People v. Fanelli, 8 A.D.3d 296, 777 N.Y.S.2d 320; People v. Mejia, 6 A.D.3d 630, 631, 774 N.Y.S.2d 801; People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816, 475 N.Y.S.2d 351). In any event, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675). RIVERA, ......
  • People v. Bravo
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 6, 2010
    ...sentence actually imposed and, therefore, he has no basis now to complain that the sentence imposed is excessive ( see People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816, 817, 475 N.Y.S.2d 351). In any event, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT