People v. Kazepis
| Decision Date | 07 May 1984 |
| Citation | People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816, 475 N.Y.S.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984) |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Thomas KAZEPIS, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Philip L. Tomach, Rockville Centre, for appellant. Denis Dillon, Dist. Atty., Mineola (George Freed, Mineola, of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Delin, J.), imposed October 6, 1983, upon his plea of guilty to criminal sale of marijuana in the fourth degree, the sentence being a definite term of imprisonment of six months. Sentence affirmed, and this case is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd. 5). Defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed. Under the circumstances of this case, defendant has no basis to now complain...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
471 cases
-
People v. Sumahit
...N.Y.S.2d 724; People v. Fanelli, 8 A.D.3d 296, 777 N.Y.S.2d 320; People v. Mejia, 6 A.D.3d 630, 631, 774 N.Y.S.2d 801; People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816, 475 N.Y.S.2d 351. In any event, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675). MASTRO, J......
-
People v. Ronconi
...( see People v. Butler, 49 A.D.3d at 895, 854 N.Y.S.2d 506; People v. Aloisi, 177 A.D.2d 491, 492, 576 N.Y.S.2d 31; People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816, 817, 475 N.Y.S.2d 351). In any event, the enhanced sentence was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d ...
-
People v. Shell
...N.Y.S.2d 724; People v. Fanelli, 8 A.D.3d 296, 777 N.Y.S.2d 320; People v. Mejia, 6 A.D.3d 630, 631, 774 N.Y.S.2d 801; People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816, 475 N.Y.S.2d 351). In any event, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675). RIVERA, ......
-
People v. Bravo
...actually imposed and, therefore, he has no basis now to complain that the sentence imposed is excessive ( see People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816, 817, 475 N.Y.S.2d 351). In any event, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d ...
Get Started for Free