People v. Kelley, s. D008219
Decision Date | 30 May 1990 |
Docket Number | D009740,Nos. D008219,s. D008219 |
Citation | 220 Cal.App.3d 1358,269 Cal.Rptr. 900 |
Court | California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Parties | The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Robert KELLEY, Defendant and Appellant. In re Robert KELLEY, on Habeas Corpus. |
John K. Van de Kamp, Atty. Gen., Richard B. Iglehart, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Harley D. Mayfield, Asst. Atty. Gen., Esteban Hernandez and Lilia E. Garcia, Deputy Attys. Gen., for plaintiff and respondent.
Robert Kelley appeals his convictions of conspiracy to commit robbery (PEN.CODE, §§ 1821, subd. (a)(1), 211) and murder (§ 187) and petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. He contends his convictions must be reversed for insufficiency of the evidence, instructional error, and his counsel's incompetence. We find instructional error infects Kelley's conviction for conspiracy to commit robbery and order that conviction reduced to conspiracy to commit theft. In all other respects, we affirm the judgment. We deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus.
In May 1986, Kelley and Proceso Serrato lived in an abandoned Pacific Bell building in the Pacific Beach area of San Diego. On May 30, 14-year-old Debra Wilson and 16-year-old Bruce Mullee, two transients living "on the streets" in Pacific Beach, stayed with Kelley and Serrato in the Pacific Bell building. Wilson and Mullee had known each other for two or three weeks and had known Kelley and Serrato for one or two weeks. Mullee went by the nickname "Little Stoner." They knew Kelley as "BK" and Serrato as "Pro." Kelley and Serrato, in particular Serrato, had talked about sailors having a lot of money. One of them had said "I'd like to have checkbooks like they do." Kelley and Serrato had also talked about going to Las Vegas on May 31, stealing a car to get there.
About 9 p.m. on May 31, the group went to an alley behind a nearby 7-Eleven. They were approached by two sailors: Brian Farr who was a tall blonde, fairly muscular man, and another man who was shorter, had dark hair and was "sort of pudgy in the face." Wilson made a call at the phone at the 7-Eleven. While she was on the phone, Kelley told her he and Serrato were going to take the sailors back to the Pacific Bell building, get them drunk and then take their money. Wilson saw Kelley and the blonde sailor, Farr, walk down the alley toward the Pacific Bell building. A little while later, Serrato entered the 7-Eleven and bought a 12-pack of Budweiser beer. A videocamera at the store recorded the sale.
While Mullee was waiting for Wilson to finish using the phone, Serrato approached and said he and Kelley were going to get the sailor drunk, have him pass out and then take his money and leave. Serrato said they were going to play a drinking game called "Quarters." Mullee explained "Quarters" is played by flipping a quarter into a cup of beer. If the quarter lands in the cup, then the individual who flipped the quarter can require another person to drink the whole cup.
Mullee and Wilson went to the beach and returned to the Pacific Bell building later that night but were unable to enter. The next day around noon, they returned to the building and saw Farr lying face down on the floor, apparently dead. Wilson anonymously reported Farr's death to the police.
Farr had been beaten to death with a rod or pipe. He died of a skull fracture and intracranial hemorrhage due to blunt trauma to the head. The evidence at the scene suggested Serrato and Kelley had played "Quarters" with Farr. An empty 12-pack Budweiser beer carton was found on the kitchen counter and 11 of the cans were The next night, June 1, about 10 p.m., Serrato and Kelley were hitchhiking in Escondido and talked to David Harmon and Westin Williams for five or ten minutes. After Harmon and Westin hung some campaign signs, they saw Serrato and Kelley attempting to steal a truck. Harmon called the police. Officer Carriere responded to the call about 10:15 p.m. He arrested Serrato. The police searched for Kelley but did not find him. The police did recover Kelley's backpack from the inside of the truck. In the backpack was a notebook with a letter dated June 1 written by Kelley apparently to Mike Reggio, a 16-year-old friend in Arizona. In the letter, Kelley wrote:
Reggio explained at trial Kelley's reference to the "bum at Kennedy" referred to an incident where a man started harassing Kelley and Reggio at a park in Tucson and Kelley had responded by pushing the man down.
On June 5, Kelley wrote a letter to Reggio which he mailed from Las Vegas. The letter was intercepted by Reggio's mother who was concerned her son might run away to Kelley. In the letter, Kelley wrote:
Kelley contends he was entitled to instructions on conspiracy to commit theft as The trial court has a duty to instruct the jury on principles of law which are closely and openly connected with the evidence and which are necessary to the jury's understanding of the case. (People v. Flannel (1979) 25 Cal.3d 668, 681, 160 Cal.Rptr. 84, 603 P.2d 1.) This duty includes giving instructions on lesser included offenses when the evidence raises a question as to whether all of the elements of the charged offense were present. (People v. Wickersham (1982) 32 Cal.3d 307, 323-324, 185 Cal.Rptr. 436, 650 P.2d 311; People v. Williams (1988) 199 Cal.App.3d 469, 475, 245 Cal.Rptr. 61.) Regardless of a request for specific instructions, the trial court must act as a neutral arbiter between the contesting parties to guide the jury on the law. (People v. Wickersham, supra, 32 Cal.3d 307, 323, 185 Cal.Rptr. 436, 650 P.2d 311.)
a lesser included offense of conspiracy to commit robbery.
Conspiracy is a specific intent crime which requires proof of an intent to agree (or conspire) to commit a particular crime. (People v. Croy (1985) 41 Cal.3d 1, 23, 221 Cal.Rptr. 592, 710 P.2d 392; People v. Horn (1974) 12 Cal.3d 290, 296, 115 Cal.Rptr. 516, 524 P.2d 1300.) (People v. Croy, supra, 41 Cal.3d 1, 23, 221 Cal.Rptr. 592, 710 P.2d 392.) The elements of robbery are (1) a taking of personal property, (2) from the person or immediate presence of another, (3) through the use of force or fear, (4) with an intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property. (§ 211; People v. Morris (1988) 46 Cal.3d 1, 19, 249 Cal.Rptr. 119, 756 P.2d 843.) Theft is a lesser included offense of robbery since theft does not require the use of force or fear in the taking. (See People v. Ramkeesoon (1985) 39 Cal.3d 346, 351, 216 Cal.Rptr. 455, 702 P.2d 613.)
The evidence here showed Kelley and Serrato had agreed to take Farr to the Pacific Bell building, to get him drunk by playing a drinking game called "Quarters" and then to take his money. Kelley and Serrato independently explained this plan to Wilson and Mullee. Wilson watched Kelley and Farr walk down the alley to the Pacific Bell building. Serrato purchased a 12-pack...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Reeves
...931 P.2d 262.) There is no evidence of such a concurrence of act and intent in the Debra E. incident. (See People v. Kelley (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 1358, 1368-1369, 269 Cal.Rptr. 900 [the taking of property from a sleeping or unconscious victim is theft, not robbery, due to absence of force o......
-
In re Jesus O.
...In re Cheri T., supra, 70 Cal.App.4th 1400, 1404, 83 Cal.Rptr.2d 397. 8. Penal Code section 211; see also, People v. Kelley (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 1358, 1366, 269 Cal.Rptr. 900. 9. People v. Vizcarra (1980) 110 Cal.App.3d 858, 861, 168 Cal.Rptr. 10. Penal Code section 212, subdivision (2). 1......
-
The People v. Reeves
...(1997) 15 Cal.4th 1, 34.) There is no evidence of such a concurrence of act and intent in the Debra E. incident. (See People v. Kelley (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 1358, 1368-1369 [the taking of property from a sleeping or unconscious victim is theft, not robbery, due to absence of force or In an ......
-
People v. Daniels
...(b)(1). Defendant attempts to combat this construction of Penal Code section 209, subdivision (b)(1) by relying on People v. Kelley (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 1358 (Kelley). In Kelley, the Court of Appeal held that there was no force, and thus there could be no robbery, where property was taken ......