People v. King

Citation175 A.D.2d 411,572 N.Y.S.2d 105
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Perry KING, Appellant.
Decision Date18 July 1991
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Patrick E. Barber, Fort Edward, for appellant.

Robert M. Winn, Dist. Atty. (Kevin C. Kortright, of counsel), Hudson Falls, for respondent.

Before MAHONEY, P.J., and YESAWICH, LEVINE, MERCURE and CREW, JJ.

YESAWICH, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (Berke, J.), rendered February 7, 1990, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of five counts of the crime of attempted assault in the second degree.

Defendant, an inmate at Great Meadow Correctional Facility in Washington County, pleaded guilty to five counts of attempted assault in the second degree in satisfaction of a 12-count indictment charging him with 10 counts of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05[3], criminal mischief and promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

It is legally impossible to commit the crime of attempted assault in the second degree (see, People v. Campbell, 72 N.Y.2d 602, 605, 535 N.Y.S.2d 580, 532 N.E.2d 86) and, because it is not a crime, it cannot be a lesser included offense (see, CPL 1.20[37], 220.20). While County Court thus lacked authority to accept this plea (CPL 220.10[4][b]; see, People v. Williams, 44 A.D.2d 216, 217-218, 354 N.Y.S.2d 213; see also, People v. Sicurella, 149 A.D.2d 983, 543 N.Y.S.2d 352; People v. Scott, 58 A.D.2d 661, 395 N.Y.S.2d 522), defendant's acquiescence in the plea waived his right to complain of this infirmity (see, People v. Ford, 62 N.Y.2d 275, 283, 476 N.Y.S.2d 783, 465 N.E.2d 322; People v. Liguori, 106 A.D.2d 404, 482 N.Y.S.2d 325).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

MAHONEY, P.J., and LEVINE, MERCURE and CREW, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • People v. Roe
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 11, 1993
    ...hypothetical or nonexistent crimes (see, e.g., People v. Foster, 19 N.Y.2d 150, 153, 278 N.Y.S.2d 603, 225 N.E.2d 200; People v. King, 175 A.D.2d 411, 572 N.Y.S.2d 105, lv. denied 78 N.Y.2d 1078, 577 N.Y.S.2d 241, 583 N.E.2d 953), the instant case is distinguishable. Unlike the cases relied......
  • People v. Martinez
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 30, 1992
    ...an indictment carrying a heavier penalty (see, People v. Foster, 19 N.Y.2d 150, 153, 278 N.Y.S.2d 603, 225 N.E.2d 200; People v. King, 175 A.D.2d 411, 572 N.Y.S.2d 105, lv. denied 78 N.Y.2d 1078, 577 N.Y.S.2d 241, 583 N.E.2d 953) waives the right to later complain about the resulting judgme......
  • People v. McCammon
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 7, 1997
    ...of a plea (see, Preiser, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons.Laws of N.Y., Book 11A, CPL 220.20 at 94; see also, People v. King, 175 A.D.2d 411, 572 N.Y.S.2d 105, app. den., 78 N.Y.2d 1078, 577 N.Y.S.2d 241, 583 N.E.2d 953). 1 It should also be observed that although the focus of Johnson......
  • Eric X, Matter of
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 18, 1991
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT