People v. Kling
Decision Date | 27 February 1964 |
Citation | 198 N.E.2d 46,248 N.Y.S.2d 661,14 N.Y.2d 571 |
Parties | , 198 N.E.2d 46 The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Thomas KLING, Appellant. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, 19 A.D.2d 750, 242 N.Y.S.2d 977.
Defendant brought a coram nobis proceeding to vacate a judgment on a verdict convicting him of first degree robbery, first degree larceny, third degree burglary, and second degree assault. Defendant alleged in support of the motion that he lost his right to appeal from the judgment of conviction because of failure of court-appointed counsel to file notice of appeal after promising to do so.
The Queens County Court, Peter T. Farrell, J., entered an order denying the motion without a hearing, and the defendant appealed.
The Appellate Division affirmed the order and held that coram nobis was not available on ground that court-appointed counsel failed to file timely notice of appeal. Kleinfeld, J., dissented.
The defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals.
John Dwight Evans, Jr., and Anthony F. Marra, New York City, for defendant-appellant.
Frank D. O'Connor, Kew Gardens (Harvey B. Erhlich, Laurelton, of counsel), for respondent.
Order affirmed (People v. Tomaselli, 7 N.Y.2d 350, 197 N.Y.S.2d 697, 165 N.E.2d 551; People v. Brown, 7 N.Y.2d 359, 197 N.Y.S.2d 705, 165 N.E.2d 557).
All concur except DESMOND, C. J., and FULD and BERGAN, JJ., who dissent and vote to reverse and order a hearing (see People v. Hairston, 10 N.Y.2d 92, 217 N.Y.S.2d 77, 176 N.E.2d 90; People v. Adams, 12 N.Y.2d 417, 240 N.Y.S.2d 155, 190 N.E.2d 529).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States ex rel. Williams v. LaVallee
...failed, to file timely notice. People v. Marchese, 14 N.Y.2d 695, 249 N.Y.S.2d 888, 198 N.E.2d 916 (1964); People v. Kling, 14 N.Y.2d 571, 248 N.Y.S.2d 661, 198 N.E.2d 46 (1964). Such was the law in 1965 when Williams was tried and sentenced; and such was the law in the fall of 1968 when hi......
-
United States ex rel. Smith v. McMann
...be arguable that the unfortunate rule of People v. Kling, 19 A.D.2d 750, 242 N.Y.S.2d 977 (2d Dept. 1963), aff'd, 14 N.Y.2d 571, 248 N.Y.S. 2d 661, 198 N.E.2d 46 (1964) (4-3 vote without opinion), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 920, 85 S.Ct. 1539, 14 L.Ed.2d 440 (1965), whereby the duties of assign......
-
United States v. Follette
...premise of this argument is that in People v. Kling, 19 App.Div.2d 750, 242 N.Y.S.2d 977, 979 (2d Dept. 1963), aff'd, 14 N.Y.2d 571, 248 N.Y.S.2d 661, 198 N.E.2d 46 (1964) (4-3 vote without opinion), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 920, 85 S.Ct. 1539, 14 L.Ed.2d 440 (1965), the Appellate Division st......
-
People v. Montgomery
...Supreme Court, Bronx County, denied Montgomery's application without a hearing on August 14, 1967, relying on People v. Kling, 14 N.Y.2d 571, 248 N.Y.S.2d 661, 198 N.E.2d 46, and People v. Marchese, 14 N.Y.2d 695, 249 N.Y.S.2d 888, 198 N.E.2d 916. The Appellate Division (First Department) u......