People v. Kozlow
Decision Date | 25 July 2006 |
Docket Number | 2005-07492. |
Citation | 821 N.Y.S.2d 212,2006 NY Slip Op 05995,31 A.D.3d 788 |
Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEFFREY KOZLOW, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Westchester County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.
The evidence was legally insufficient to support the defendant's convictions of attempted disseminating indecent material to minors in the first degree (seePenal Law §§ 110.00,235.22).The People failed to establish that the defendant's Internet communications with an undercover police officer whom he believed to be a minor "depict[ed]" sexual conduct within the meaning of Penal Law § 235.22 (1), since they contained no visual, "sexual images"(People v Foley,94 NY2d 668, 681[2000], cert denied531 US 875[2000];seePenal Law § 235.21 [1], ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
People v. Price
...the transmission of any sexual images. Nearly six months later, on July 25, 2006, the Second Department held in People v. Kozlow, 31 A.D.3d 788, 821 N.Y.S.2d 212 (2006), revd. 8 N.Y.3d 554, 838 N.Y.S.2d 800, 870 N.E.2d 118 (2007) that a defendant may not be convicted of the above-named crim......
-
People v. Kozlow
...not have "depicted" sexual conduct within the meaning of Penal Law § 235.22(1), since they included no visual, sexual images (31 A.D.3d 788, 821 N.Y.S.2d 212 [2006] ). A Judge of this Court granted leave to appeal, and we now In 1996, the New York State Legislature introduced statutes crimi......
-
In re Kozlow
...sexual conduct within the meaning of Penal Law § 235.22(1), since they contained no visual, ‘sexual images' ” (31 A.D.3d 788, 821 N.Y.S.2d 212 [2d Dept.2006] [internal citations omitted] ). Consequently, on September 28, 2006, upon motion by respondent pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(5)(a), ......
-
People v. Kozlow
...State of New York, Appellant, v. Jeffrey KOZLOW, Respondent. Court of Appeals of New York. February 20, 2007. Reported below, 31 A.D.3d 788, 821 N.Y.S.2d 212. Motion by New York State District Attorneys Association for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the e......