People v. Laboriel

• Decision Date: 24 January 2017
• Parties: The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Wilson LABORIEL, also known as Wilson Labriel, also known as Labriel Wilson, Defendant–Appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

146 A.D.3d 631

45 N.Y.S.3d 451

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 00427

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,

v.Wilson LABORIEL, also known as Wilson Labriel, also known as Labriel Wilson, Defendant–Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Jan. 24, 2017.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Rachel T. Goldberg of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Susan Axelrod of counsel), for respondent.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., RENWICK, FEINMAN, GISCHE, KAPNICK, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered June 25, 2013, as amended July 24, 2013, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a firearm in the second degree, six counts of criminal sale of a firearm in the third degree and four counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 30 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of directing that all of the sentences run concurrently with each other, and otherwise affirmed.

Defendant's standard form motion for assignment of new counsel did not contain the specific factual allegations of serious complaints about counsel necessary to trigger the court's obligation to make a minimal inquiry (see People v. Porto, 16 N.Y.3d 93, 100–101, 917 N.Y.S.2d 74, 942 N.E.2d 283 [2010] ). Although the court accorded defendant several opportunities to be heard, defendant failed to amplify his conclusory complaints about his attorney with any case-specific allegations.

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion, in which he claimed that there was no probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant for his Facebook account. The affidavit in support of the warrant demonstrated that there was sufficient information to support a reasonable belief that evidence of the charged weapons crimes could be found in defendant's Facebook page, particularly in light of a pattern of Facebook connections among other members of the weapons-trafficking operation. Defendant's claim regarding the execution of the warrant is unpreserved, as well as unreviewable for lack of a sufficient record (see People v. McLean, 15 N.Y.3d 117, 119, 905 N.Y.S.2d 536, 931 N.E.2d 520 [2010] ; People v. Kinchen, 60 N.Y.2d 772, 773–774, 469 N.Y.S.2d 680, 457 N.E.2d 786 [1983] ; see also People v. Abrew, 95 N.Y.2d 806, 808, 710 N.Y.S.2d 833, 732 N.E.2d 940 [2000] ). In any event, the Facebook evidence was a...