People v. Lee

Decision Date30 March 1962
Docket NumberCr. 7795
Citation20 Cal.Rptr. 360,202 Cal.App.2d 36
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Harold Joseph LEE, Defendant and Appellant.

Charles B. Johnson, Pasadena, for defendant and appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Atty. Gen., William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., George W. Kell, Deputy Atty. Gen., for plaintiff and respondent.

JEFFERSON, Justice.

In an information filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County, defendant was charged in one count with forgery in violation of Penal Code section 470.

The information alleged two prior convictions for forgery. Defendant pleaded not guilty. Trial was by the court, trial by jury having been duly waived by defendant and all counsel. Testimony was offered by the People and defendant admitted the priors as alleged. Defendant was found guilty as charged. A probation report was ordered. Probation was denied. Defendant was sentenced to state prison for the term prescribed by law. Defendant appealed from the judgment of conviction and the order denying the motion for a new trial.

Raymond Orlich, operations manager for the Travelers Express Company, identified money order No. 13186819 and dated February 8, 1961, made payable to the order of Milton Thomas, Jr. in the amount of $71.00 and bearing the signature of Rose Thomas at the bottom. An 'accounting copy' bearing the same serial number and the same perforations was identified as a carbon copy of the money order. These two exhibits came to the agency with a carbon paper inserted between them. Blank money orders are kept in the safe at the agency until issued. In this case the money order and its corresponding copy were issued to an agency, the Burns Liquor Store on South Central Avenue, Los Angeles. Mr. Perlman, who was in charge of the Burns Liquor Store, died the day before the preliminary hearing. The carbon copy of the money order, indicates by the perforations in the upper right hand corner that it was issued for $1.00 under the accounting procedures of the company. The company issues special checkwriting machines to its agencies. These machines stamp the agency number onto the money order at the time the money order is issued by the agency. In this case No. 444, the agency's number, was stamped on the money order when it was issued by the agency.

Emma Callendar, liquor store clerk for the Burns Liquor Store, identified the paymaster machine. This machine had been in their store continuously since the time of the offense. She testified she did not know who issued the money order referred to, but that in passing a money order the original and the carbon are inserted into the machine. The original copy is retained by the customer and the agency keeps the copy. Emma Callendar further testified that she is familiar with Mr. Perlman's handwriting, but that certain figures on the money order did not look like his handwriting.

George H. Smith, a police officer, testified he had searched for 'Milton Thomas, Jr.' and 'Rose Thomas' and was unable to locate either of them. The address given for Rose Thomas was checked out, and it was determined that no one by that name had ever lived at that address.

Don M. Harding, a handwriting expert, compared the copy of the money order and found that the digit '7' as found in the '$71.00' on the money order did not appear to be the same 7 as that which was on the machine itself.

Joseph B. Oderberg of Fred's Liquor Store testified that the money order was brought to him by George Colter and another man with the request that he cash it. At this time the money order was in its present condition. He testified he refused to cash the money order and two men left in a pale green Studebaker club coupe, occupied by four people.

Frank Castillo, Jr., attendant at the Major Gas Station in Pasadena, testified defendant came to him on February 11, and asked him to cash the money order for 'Milton Thomas, Jr.' who accompanied defendant at that time. Castillo cashed the money order for Thomas and sold him about $3.50 worth of gas. Three dollars and fifty cents was subtracted from the $71.00 and defendant was handed the balance in cash. Two men were in the back seat of the car. George Colter was identified as one of the other four passengers of the automobile. Defendant was identified as the driver.

Officer George H. Smith arrested defendant on February 11, 1961, on Washington Street in Pasadena. Smith had observed the car in the service station, followed the car as it pulled out of the Major Gas Station and stopped it. Defendant was driving, with Colter seated in the right front seat. In the back seat were J. D. Douglas and Harold Thomas. Defendant was asked if the officers could search the car, to which he agreed. Defendant stated he had just been to the service station; that he had purchased gas; that Thomas had paid for the gas with cash; he denied that the money order had been cashed at the gas station.

After the search, the officers were unable to find the money order in the automobile. All four men were placed under arrest and taken back to the service station, where the officers obtained the money order. On the way to the police station defendant stated that he had received the money for the money order but denied he knew it was forged. At the police station the officers found $50.00 in defendant's wallet. Defendant admitted that $42.00 of this money was from the money order.

In the presence of defendant, Thomas stated defendant had picked him up at the Dew-Drop Inn, where the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Laster
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 10, 1971
    ...70 Cal.2d 171, 180--181, 74 Cal.Rptr. 262, 449 P.2d 198, cert. den. 395 U.S. 968, 89 S.Ct. 2116, 23 L.Ed.2d 755; People v. Lee (1962) 202 Cal.App.2d 36, 40, 20 Cal.Rptr. 360; and People v. Carlson (1960) 177 Cal.App.2d 201, 205--207, 2 Cal.Rptr. 117.) It is a circumstance to consider togeth......
  • People v. Adams
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • February 19, 1968
    ...284, 287, 42 Cal.Rptr. 676, 678. Accord: People v. Garcia, supra, 201 Cal.App.2d 589, 594, 20 Cal.Rptr. 242; and People v. Lee (1962) 202 Cal.App.2d 36, 40, 20 Cal.Rptr. 360.) The courts, however, have uniformly recognized and applied the following rule: "The presence of one at the commissi......
  • State v. Peck, 10353
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • May 17, 1967
    ...facts and circumstances may establish his guilt of the offense. People v. Carlson,177 Cal.App.2d 201, 2 Cal.Rptr. 117; People v. Lee, 202 Cal.App.2d 36, 20 Cal.Rptr. 360. The facts and circumstances show the defendant was seen leaning into Maron's automobile on the side where shortly before......
  • People v. Madison
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 15, 1966
    ...of a crime is not sufficient to make him a participant, People v. Mauldin, 181 Cal.App.2d 184, 189, 5 Cal.Rptr. 243; People v. Lee, 202 Cal.App.2d 36, 40, 20 Cal.Rptr. 360, although it is a circumstance from which his participation in the criminal intent may be inferred. (People v. Moore, 1......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT