People v. LeGrady

Decision Date22 April 2008
Docket Number2007-01335.,2007-01336.,2007-01337.
Citation2008 NY Slip Op 03669,856 N.Y.S.2d 224,50 A.D.3d 1059
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL LeGRADY, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgments and the amended judgment are affirmed.

Since the defendant failed to move to withdraw his pleas prior to sentencing, his current contention that the pleas were not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726 [1995]; People v Fecu, 38 AD3d 565 [2007]; People v Huchital, 22 AD3d 681 [2005]). This is not a case "where the defendant's recitation of the facts underlying the crime[s] pleaded to clearly casts significant doubt upon the defendant's guilt or otherwise calls into question the voluntariness of the plea" (People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]). In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant's pleas of guilty were entered "voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently" (People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; see People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]; People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909, 910-911 [1990]; People v Matos, 27 AD3d 485 [2006]). The defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel cannot be reached on this appeal since it is based on matter dehors the record (see People v Villacreses, 12 AD3d 624, 626 [2004]).

The sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Dillon, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • People v. Shaffer
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 22 Febrero 2011
    ...v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, 726, 631 N.Y.S.2d 119, 655 N.E.2d 160; People v. Trent, 74 A.D.3d 1370, 903 N.Y.S.2d 236; People v. LeGrady, 50 A.D.3d 1059, 1060, 856 N.Y.S.2d 224; People v. Ramsey, 49 A.D.3d 565, 855 N.Y.S.2d 162). Furthermore, the record does not support the defendant's claim th......
  • People v. Trent
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 29 Junio 2010
    ...ground prior to sentencing ( see CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, 726, 631 N.Y.S.2d 119, 655 N.E.2d 160; People v. LeGrady, 50 A.D.3d 1059, 856 N.Y.S.2d 224; People v. Ramsey, 49 A.D.3d 565, 855 N.Y.S.2d 162; People v. Herdt, 45 A.D.3d 698, 844 N.Y.S.2d 882). In any event, the......
  • People v. Paulin
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 8 Marzo 2011
    ...for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, 726, 631 N.Y.S.2d 119, 655 N.E.2d 160; People v. LeGrady, 50 A.D.3d 1059, 1060, 856 N.Y.S.2d 224). This is not a case "where the defendant's recitation of the facts underlying the crime pleaded to clearly casts signi......
  • People v. Wagstaff
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 11 Mayo 2010
    ...the record ( see People v. Ali, 55 A.D.3d 919, 865 N.Y.S.2d 579; People v. Drago, 50 A.D.3d 920, 855 N.Y.S.2d 252; People v. LeGrady, 50 A.D.3d 1059, 1060, 856 N.Y.S.2d 224; People v. Ross, 41 AD3d 870, 871, 841 N.Y.S.2d 310; People v. Villacreses, 12 A.D.3d 624, 626, 785 N.Y.S.2d 103). Sin......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT