People v. Lehrman

Decision Date27 November 1989
Citation155 A.D.2d 693,548 N.Y.S.2d 260
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Alan LEHRMAN, a/k/a, A.L. Gary, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

John F. Clennan, Ronkonkoma, for appellant.

Denis Dillon, Dist. Atty., Mineola (Bruce E. Whitney and Douglas Noll, of counsel), for respondent.

Before LAWRENCE, J.P., and KUNZEMAN, EIBER and HARWOOD, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered February 23, 1988, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

By affidavit dated January 18, 1988, before the sentence was imposed but 45 days after pronouncement of the guilty verdict and the polling of the individual jurors, Juror No. 11 asserted that while sequestered in a motel following a day of jury deliberations where she had taken the "minority" position that the defendant was not guilty, the juror with whom she had been instructed to share a hotel room indicated that she "was not pleased" with the affiant's view of the case and proceeded to discuss the facts. Juror No. 11 further attested that her roommate "threatened" that it would be her fault if a verdict was not reached the following day, a Friday, thus requiring sequestration over the weekend. Juror No. 11 claimed that the following day, she changed her vote to guilty because of the "pressure" exerted by her roommate the night before. There is no indication that Juror No. 11 was a lone "hold-out".

After submission by Juror No. 11 of the foregoing affidavit on the asserted ground that she felt "terrible" that she had been "bullied" by her roommate, the defendant moved pursuant to CPL 330.30(2) to set aside the verdict. We conclude that the trial court's denial of that motion was proper.

It is the rule in this State that, with rare exception (cf., People v. Rukaj, 123 A.D.2d 277, 506 N.Y.S.2d 677; People v. Lavender, 117 A.D.2d 253, 502 N.Y.S.2d 439), a jury verdict may not be impeached "by proof of the tenor of its deliberations" (People v. Brown, 48 N.Y.2d 388, 393, 423 N.Y.S.2d 461, 399 N.E.2d 51). This is not a case where the jury has been improperly influenced by matters going beyond the scope of the trial evidence, such as unauthorized comments by court personnel (see, Parker v. Gladden, 385 U.S. 363, 87 S.Ct. 468, 17 L.Ed.2d 420) or where the jurors themselves become unsworn witnesses against the accused ( see, People v. Brown, 48 N.Y.2d 388, 423 N.Y.S.2d 461, 399 N.E.2d 51, supra; People v. DeLucia, 20 N.Y.2d 275, 282 N.Y.S.2d 526, 229...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • People v. Fortunato, 2007 NY Slip Op 33875(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 11/20/2007)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 20 Noviembre 2007
    ...well-settled that a "jury verdict may not be impeached by statements going to the tenor of the jury's deliberations." People v. Lehrman, 155 A.D.2d 693 (2d Dept. 1989); see People v. Brown, 48 N.Y.2d 388, 393 (1979) . Thus, a claim that a juror was bullied, coerced, or intimidated by other ......
  • People v. Addison
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 7 Noviembre 1997
    ...the law (People v. Paz, 159 A.D.2d 987, 552 N.Y.S.2d 753, lv. denied 76 N.Y.2d 793, 559 N.Y.S.2d 999, 559 N.E.2d 693; People v. Lehrman, 155 A.D.2d 693, 548 N.Y.S.2d 260; People v. James, 112 A.D.2d 380, 491 N.Y.S.2d 836), even when their statements are virtually unanimous. (Matter of Olive......
  • People v. Anderson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 13 Abril 1998
    ...this conduct does not mandate that the verdict be set aside (see, People v. Johnson, 224 A.D.2d 635, 639 N.Y.S.2d 407; People v. Lehrman, 155 A.D.2d 693, 548 N.Y.S.2d 260). Thus, the defendant was not denied his right to a fair The defendant's sentence was not excessive. The defendant's rem......
  • People v. Thomas
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 11 Febrero 1991
    ..."by proof of the tenor of its deliberations" (People v. Brown, 48 N.Y.2d 388, 393, 423 N.Y.S.2d 461, 399 N.E.2d 51; People v. Lehrman, 155 A.D.2d 693, 548 N.Y.S.2d 260). The defendant's motion papers, supported only by hearsay allegations as to what one of the jurors purportedly told the af......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT