People v. Leonard

Decision Date10 December 1970
Citation318 N.Y.S.2d 496,27 N.Y.2d 959
Parties, 267 N.E.2d 272 PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Barry LEONARD, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, 33 A.D.2d 1010, 308 N.Y.S.2d 77.

Burton B. Roberts, New York City (Donald B. Liberman, New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

The defendant, upon his plea of guilty, was convicted of the crime of possession of a dangerous drug in the fourth degree by a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, Brust, J., and he appealed.

The Appellate Division held that since defendant chose not to supply his version of the occurrence and there was no competent evidence in record showing that defendant was deprived of his freedom in any significant way or that there had been an illegal search and seizure of evidence, motion to suppress evidence obtained after officers questioned defendant as to his possession of marijuana which he produced in apartment was properly denied, and the judgment of conviction was affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.

Before the Court of Appeals the People argued that on basis of the record before the trial court the motion to suppress was properly denied and that the review of the Court of Appeals was limited to a determination of whether trial court's findings were erroneous as a matter of law.

Judgment affirmed.

All concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • People v. Janto
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 13 Enero 1972
    ... ... The denial of his motion may be reviewed on this appeal notwithstanding the fact that the judgment is predicated on his plea of guilty (Code of Criminal Procedure § 813-c). The motion to suppress was based solely on the hearsay affidavit of his attorney. In People v. Leonard, 33 A.D.2d 1010, 308 N.Y.S.2d 77, affd. 27 N.Y.2d 959, 318 N.Y.S.2d 496, 267 N.E.2d 272, the court in affirming a conviction in a similar situation said: 'The motion to suppress was based solely on the testimony of the arresting police officer ... and the hearsay affidavit of defendant's ... ...
  • People v. Batalias
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 10 Diciembre 1970
  • People v. Gillenwater
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 10 Diciembre 1970

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT