People v. Levine

Decision Date02 July 1985
Citation482 N.E.2d 1206,65 N.Y.2d 845,493 N.Y.S.2d 290
Parties, 482 N.E.2d 1206 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David LEVINE, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division, 100 A.D.2d 983, 473 N.Y.S.2d 898, should be affirmed.

The circumstantial evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilty of murder in the second degree. The record shows that defendant lived in an apartment adjoining the victim's and he could have had access to her apartment either through the door or across a ledge and through a partially opened window. He used a credit card belonging to the victim to buy a pair of shoes within two or three hours after the victim had been strangled and stabbed to death in her bedroom. He falsely stated that he found a wallet containing the credit card in a park at a time after he used the card to buy the shoes and that he had thrown the wallet away. The victim's wallet containing her other credit cards was found, pursuant to a search warrant, in a box in defendant's bedroom. The victim had not reported her credit cards missing, and when her body was discovered, her purse was found on her living room table, opened, with no money or credit cards inside. Upon examination of defendant following his arrest, scratch marks were observed on his back.

Defendant's false statements are not only evidence of consciousness of guilt of some crime, but also show defendant's attempts to distance himself from the time and place of the murder (see, People v. Benzinger, 36 N.Y.2d 29, 33-34, 364 N.Y.S.2d 855, 324 N.E.2d 334). These facts taken all together, in combination with the evidence of motive, are inconsistent with defendant's innocence and exclude to a moral certainty every other reasonable hypothesis (see, People v. Marin, 65 N.Y.2d 741, 492 N.Y.S.2d 16, 481 N.E.2d 556; People v. Bearden, 290 N.Y. 478, 480, 49 N.E.2d 785; see also, People v. Baskerville, 60 N.Y.2d 374, 382-383, 469 N.Y.S.2d 646, 457 N.E.2d 752 [discussing the inference that may be drawn from recent possession of the fruits of a crime] ).

We have considered defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit.

WACHTLER, C.J., and JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, TITONE and BOOMER * JJ., concur.

ALEXANDER, J.,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Quartararo v. Hanslmaier
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 30 Noviembre 1998
    ...1990) (affirming conviction where eyewitness heard defendant make a threat and then shoot the victim); People v. Levine, 65 N.Y.2d 845, 493 N.Y.S.2d 290, 482 N.E.2d 1206 (1985) (affirming conviction where defendant lied to police and where victim's wallet was found in defendant's bedroom); ......
  • People v. Sims
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 30 Septiembre 1985
    ...serious burns existed or were noticeable prior to the time she brought Tonya to Mrs. Stevens' apartment (see, People v. Levine, 65 N.Y.2d 845, 493 N.Y.S.2d 290, 482 N.E.2d 1206). While standing alone, evidence indicating a consciousness of guilt is recognized as being inherently weak (see, ......
  • Solomon v. Commissioner of Correctional Services
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 28 Febrero 1992
    ...of guilt." People v. Benzinger, 36 N.Y.2d 29, 364 N.Y.S.2d 855, 324 N.E.2d 334 (Ct.App. 1974); see People v. Levine, 65 N.Y.2d 845, 493 N.Y.S.2d 290, 482 N.E.2d 1206 (Ct.App. 1985). Furthermore, such conduct can show subjective awareness of the risk, thereby establishing the mens rea of rec......
  • Valenko v. Artus
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 16 Septiembre 2021
    ... ... The ... Court assumes familiarity with the facts of the case as set ... forth in detail in the R&R and in People v. Valenko, 6 ... N.Y.S.3d 142 (App. Div. 2015), appeal denied, 25 N.Y.3d 1172 ... (2015), but provides a summary of the relevant facts ... fact could find beyond a reasonable doubt that he was ... guilty); People v. Levine, 65 N.Y.2d 845, 846-47 ... (1985) (finding circumstantial evidence sufficient to support ... the jury's guilty verdict, where the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT